← pool

🏛️ Socialist policy turn across the industrialized democracies

Friedberg's global read off the French second round: left-and-center tactical alliances plus a rising socialist mood among the youth of the industrialized world are producing governments that campaign on 90% top tax rates, mandatory wage hikes, earlier retirement and price controls on food and energy - a mix that ends in unsustainable debt accumulation, inflation and unemployment, and that reprices French and broader developed-market equities lower. Sacks and Chamath take the other side: France was a manipulated candidate-withdrawal result plus ordinary anti-incumbent turnover, and a hung assembly means none of the radical policy actually passes.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 51.1 WATCH
WATCH
band
▼ SHORT EWQ
expression · bearish politics-market
MISS
outcome · R -12.8% · α -25.6%
2025-07-12
window closed

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2024-07-12 → 2025-07-12 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT EWQ (primary play). EWQ rose 12.8% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -12.8% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +12.8%α = -12.8 − (+12.8) = -25.6% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: -0.1% — did EWQ move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Friedberg, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2024-07-12)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT EWQetf PRIMARY French equities are the direct expression of a New Popular Front policy agenda
▼ SHORT EWUetf adjacent UK is named as part of the same leftward election sweep
▼ SHORT EZUetf adjacent eurozone equities carry the same fiscal and policy contagion

Mention log

Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E187 (2024-07-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 47:00 SUPPORT
“But really what I think we're seeing is a much bigger shift where there's this bigger battle between socialism and free market democracy.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E187 (2024-07-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 51:57 OPPOSE
“Yeah, look, I don't think that the use demand for socialism is what's driving the results in France at all.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E187 (2024-07-12) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:01:58 OPPOSE
“I do think Friedberg is touching on something, but I think the explanation doesn't have to be this idea that people are embracing socialism.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E193 (2024-08-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:17:41 SUPPORT
“And I was looking at the total GDP of the United States is $25 trillion. The federal budget for next year is proposed to be $7.2 trillion. And state and local budgets combined is about $4 trillion. So if you look at government spending, it's about half of GDP now”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E193 (2024-08-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:04:28 SUPPORT
“I think that Elizabeth Warren and Bernie sanders are now the thought leaders and really the beating heart of the Democrat Party. I think what's happened is the Republican Party has moved to right-wing populism, and the Democrats in response to that have concluded that they need to basically move to left-wing populism in order to compete with that. So both parties are becoming fairly populist. Now, what does left-wing populism mean? It basically means soak the rich, right?”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E203 (2024-11-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:34:40 REVERSAL
“My big prediction over the next few years is you will see a more centrist Democratic Party as they try and re-incorporate.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E203 (2024-11-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 27:26 SUPPORT
“They're not going to attack. If you think that the intelligentsia, quote unquote, the Bill Gates, Reid Hoffmans of the world that funds, Dustin Moskovitz that funds the Democratic apparatus at the highest level, if they can't change, what are the odds that the state infrastructure or the local infrastructure changes?”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E215 (2025-02-15) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 33:23 SUPPORT
“You know, GDP per capita in the EU, $60,000 a year, GDP per capita in the United States, like $82,000, but GDP per capita in India is $2,500 and China's $12,600. There's a greater incentive in those countries to manifest upside than there is for the United States and the EU who are more worried about manifesting downside. ... And the countries that are more techno-pessimistic are unfortunately going to find themselves asking for greater government control, government intervention in markets, government's creating jobs, government making payments to people, government's effectively running the economy.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E218 (2025-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:18:01 SUPPORT
“The individual governments of Europe are vibrant and powerful. The European Union itself was created almost without any real teeth. And so what happened is the folks there started to pass inordinate numbers of laws. And that has made it really complicated to be a European company, a European citizen. And that has to get sorted out.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E222 (2025-04-05) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:34:11 SUPPORT
“And that's why I said my contrarian bet for this year was this rise in socialist policy and the response to some of the actions the administration might take. But we'll see how it goes out.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E233 (2025-06-28) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 42:02 SUPPORT
“For me, it feels like actually a little bit of a beginning of a wave that's going to continue to sweep over this country starting in cities. And I think that we're at the very early stages. I think we'll look back and I jokingly say that Kamala Harris is going to look like a conservative candidate pretty soon.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E233 (2025-06-28) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 48:13 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“they don't see that socialism always fails wherever it's tried. San Francisco went through this. I mean, it was a doom spiral. Now, I think we've turned the corner. LA is in the midst of going through it, and a large portion of LA just burned down because there's no water in the fire hydrants. Basically, all the public services have been looted. And New York is about to learn this for themselves.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E233 (2025-06-28) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 56:10 OPPOSE
“I think the three of you guys are a little exaggerated, to be quite honest. I mean, all the rhetoric sounds very clever, but I don't think it's accurate. I think the way that I see it is more nuanced than this.”
Friedberg
Friedberg politics-market w=0.84 · n=74 · E234 (2025-07-04) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 44:32 SUPPORT
“And that's why I'm so convinced that there's a rise in socialism in this country because in this sort of an inflationary environment, like we're seeing so far this year, you don't see it in the dollar inflation numbers. You see it in the dollar currency numbers. You're going to say, man, I need an alternative.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E234 (2025-07-04) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 32:11 SUPPORT
“And I think when everybody realizes that the alternative is essentially some insane form of socialism and redistribution, I think the alliance will hold and that they'll find some common ground.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.84
7 scoring events · 55% of moves
+89.3 / -21.2 → net +68.1
Chamath
Chamath w=1.02
5 scoring events · 28% of moves
+31.8 / -24.5 → net +7.3
Sacks
Sacks w=0.97
3 scoring events · 17% of moves
+22.2 / -11.6 → net +10.6

⏳ decay drained -37.1 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E187 2024-07-12 init +35.2 35.2 E187 born by Friedberg (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.84]
E187 2024-07-12 oppose -11.6 23.6 E187 Sacks opposes x2 [w=0.97]
E187 2024-07-12 oppose -12.2 11.3 E187 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.02]
E188 2024-07-19 decay -0.5 10.9 E188 silent
E189 2024-07-26 decay -0.4 10.5 E189 silent
E190 2024-08-02 decay -0.4 10.0 E190 silent
E191 2024-08-09 decay -0.4 9.6 E191 silent
E192 2024-08-16 decay -0.4 9.3 E192 silent
E193 2024-08-23 reinforce +13.1 22.4 E193 Sacks support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=0.97]
E193 2024-08-23 reinforce +11.7 34.1 E193 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.84]
E194 2024-08-30 decay -1.4 32.7 E194 silent
E195 2024-09-06 decay -1.3 31.4 E195 silent
E196 2024-09-20 decay -1.3 30.2 E196 silent
E197 2024-09-27 decay -1.2 29.0 E197 silent
E198 2024-10-03 decay -1.2 27.8 E198 silent
E199 2024-10-11 decay -1.1 26.7 E199 silent
E200 2024-10-18 decay -1.1 25.6 E200 silent
E201 2024-10-25 decay -1.0 24.6 E201 silent
E202 2024-11-01 decay -1.0 23.6 E202 silent
E203 2024-11-08 reinforce +11.7 35.3 E203 Chamath support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.02]
E203 2024-11-08 reversal -21.2 14.1 E203 Friedberg flips
E204 2024-11-16 decay -0.6 13.6 E204 silent
E205 2024-11-23 decay -0.5 13.0 E205 silent
E206 2024-12-07 decay -0.5 12.5 E206 silent
E207 2024-12-13 decay -0.5 12.0 E207 silent
E208 2024-12-20 decay -0.5 11.5 E208 silent
E209 2025-01-04 decay -0.5 11.1 E209 silent
E210 2025-01-11 decay -0.4 10.6 E210 silent
E211 2025-01-18 decay -0.4 10.2 E211 silent
E212 2025-01-25 decay -0.4 9.8 E212 silent
E213 2025-01-31 decay -0.4 9.4 E213 silent
E214 2025-02-07 decay -0.4 9.0 E214 silent
E215 2025-02-15 reinforce +13.7 22.7 E215 Friedberg support x3 (flipped from reversal) [w=0.84]
E216 2025-02-21 decay -0.9 21.8 E216 silent
E217 2025-03-01 decay -0.9 21.0 E217 silent
E218 2025-03-08 reinforce +12.1 33.1 E218 Chamath support x2 [w=1.02]
E219 2025-03-15 decay -1.3 31.7 E219 silent
E220 2025-03-22 decay -1.3 30.5 E220 silent
E221 2025-03-29 decay -1.2 29.2 E221 silent
E222 2025-04-05 reinforce +8.9 38.1 E222 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.84]
E223 2025-04-11 decay -1.5 36.6 E223 silent
E224 2025-04-19 decay -1.5 35.1 E224 silent
E225 2025-04-26 decay -1.4 33.7 E225 silent
E226 2025-05-02 decay -1.3 32.4 E226 silent
E227 2025-05-09 decay -1.3 31.1 E227 silent
E228 2025-05-17 decay -1.2 29.9 E228 silent
E229 2025-05-24 decay -1.2 28.7 E229 silent
E231 2025-06-13 decay -1.1 27.5 E231 silent
E232 2025-06-21 decay -1.1 26.4 E232 silent
E233 2025-06-28 reinforce +11.1 37.5 E233 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.84]
E233 2025-06-28 reinforce +9.1 46.6 E233 Sacks support x2 [w=0.97]
E233 2025-06-28 oppose -12.2 34.3 E233 Chamath opposes x2 [w=1.02]
E234 2025-07-04 reinforce +8.0 42.4 E234 Chamath support x1 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.02]
E234 2025-07-04 reinforce +8.7 51.1 E234 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.84]
E235 2025-07-11 decay -2.0 49.0 E235 silent