🤖 Inference cost collapse deflates OpenAI, LLM startups and Nvidia's multiple
Latency and token prices are economically untenable; custom-hardware startups 1000x the market, open-source proliferates, closed-model economics get reallocated — OpenAI's enterprise value falls and it is 'very hard for NVIDIA to maintain a multiple of market cap' in 2024. LLM startups reprice 50-80% down.
also touching these tickers, same direction: Nvidia risk: special-purpose silicon + Huawei 10 (NVDA)
⚖ Why this verdict
fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2024-01-06 → 2025-01-06 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▼ SHORT NVDA (primary play). NVDA rose 186.1% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -186.1% (the call lost money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +27.1%
→ α = -186.1 − (+27.1) = -213.1%
— what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
Stock-selection read: -159.0% — did NVDA move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
- Rule fired:
· HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5· PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0▶ MISS — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Friedberg, Jason, Sacks
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2024-01-06)
Plays
| expression | symbol | kind | relevance | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ SHORT | NVDA | stock | PRIMARY | the only public name in the thesis — multiple-compression call |
Mention log
“I think the enterprise value of OpenAI goes down... folks [building custom hardware] will multiply the capability of this market by 1000x... open source models really proliferate, proprietary and closed models go under pressure... it's going to be very hard for existing folks — and I would say the same is probably true for NVIDIA — to maintain a multiple of market cap. In this next year, that happens.”
“My worst-performing asset in 2024 is LLM startups. They've been massively overvalued and open source is making an incredible run at them... too many players and too much parity... they're all going to come down by 50, 60, 70, 80% in terms of their valuations.”
“The perfect analogy of EC2 and S3 in 2024 is the token per second provider. Now, there you have to double click and say, OK, well, what does a token per second provider need to do to make a lot of money? And I think the ultimate answer is you need your own proprietary hardware.”
“And I think he's very compelling in arguing why some of the big cloud providers today that are offering infrastructure for AI model training and inference are going to be challenged if someone can build full stack and do it successfully.”
“you're about to see a one-tenthing of the compute cost ... So today, you raise $100 million because you need to spend 70 or 80 on compute. Tomorrow when you only need to spend seven or eight for the same amount of throughput”
“when you can do more with less, it doesn't mean you need less chips. It means you need a lot more chips ... it really starts to rationalize the Nvidia thesis that it could be worth ten trillion dollars potentially”
“you now see developers stress testing us and finding that we are meaningfully, meaningfully faster and cheaper than any Nvidia solution, there's the potential here to be really disruptive ... So there's a lot of market cap for Groq to gain by just being able to produce these things at scale”
“By the way, developers, by the way, on Groq, just this past week, in the queue, the wait list tripled. Now there's almost 10,000 developers. ... I think the most important North Star metric for these developer platforms is basically that. As goes the developers, so goes the platform.”
“It is a real community that's come together building around Groq. And what I will say is, you know, sort of the same jump that developers saw when we went from dial-up internet to broadband.”
“he did a very good job of explaining where Nvidia is really strong, which is really in learning, and where Nvidia is trying to build the business, which is an inference... he said that if he deploys his roadmap, he'll have 50% of the available inference compute by the end of next year”
“In my talk with Sunny this week, he mentioned that these new models are so much more efficient that you actually can throw the old model in the garbage because it's so inefficient. And these are now becoming about 90% cheaper every year, which means every two years these things are going to be 99% cheaper and better.”
“it's very likely we end up seeing a lot of more smaller targeted models being used in specific applications instead of one massive general purpose model being used, or networks of smaller models, which is really where I think the industry is going”
“I think that when you look at the impacts and pricing that all of these open-source and closed-source model companies have now introduced in terms of the price per token, what we've seen is just a massive step function lower. It is incredibly deflationary.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -84.7 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E160 2024-01-06 | init | +42.1 | 42.1 | E160 born by Jason (annual_prediction x2) [w=1.05] |
| E160 2024-01-06 | reinforce | +11.8 | 53.9 | E160 Chamath support x2 (new voice) [w=0.90] |
| E161 2024-01-13 | decay | -2.2 | 51.8 | E161 silent |
| E162 2024-01-19 | decay | -2.1 | 49.7 | E162 silent |
| E163 2024-01-26 | decay | -2.0 | 47.7 | E163 silent |
| E164 2024-02-02 | decay | -1.9 | 45.8 | E164 silent |
| E165 2024-02-09 | reinforce | +8.8 | 54.6 | E165 Chamath support x3 [w=0.90] |
| E165 2024-02-09 | reinforce | +8.8 | 63.4 | E165 Friedberg support x1 (new voice) [w=1.08] |
| E166 2024-02-16 | reinforce | +5.0 | 68.4 | E166 Chamath support x2 [w=0.90] |
| E166 2024-02-16 | oppose | -15.5 | 52.9 | E166 Friedberg opposes x3 [w=1.08] |
| E167 2024-02-23 | reinforce | +7.7 | 60.5 | E167 Chamath support x3 [w=0.90] |
| E168 2024-03-01 | reinforce | +5.4 | 65.9 | E168 Chamath support x2 [w=0.90] |
| E169 2024-03-08 | reinforce | +4.6 | 70.5 | E169 Chamath support x2 [w=0.90] |
| E169 2024-03-08 | reinforce | +3.3 | 73.8 | E169 Sandeep Madra support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50] |
| E169 2024-03-08 | reinforce | +3.6 | 77.5 | E169 Sacks support x1 (new voice) [w=0.77] |
| E170 2024-03-15 | decay | -3.1 | 74.4 | E170 silent |
| E171 2024-03-22 | decay | -3.0 | 71.4 | E171 silent |
| E172 2024-03-29 | decay | -2.9 | 68.5 | E172 silent |
| E173 2024-04-05 | decay | -2.7 | 65.8 | E173 silent |
| E174 2024-04-12 | reinforce | +5.6 | 71.4 | E174 Chamath support x3 [w=0.90] |
| E175 2024-04-19 | decay | -2.9 | 68.5 | E175 silent |
| E176 2024-04-26 | reinforce | +5.1 | 73.6 | E176 Chamath support x3 [w=0.90] |
| E177 2024-05-03 | decay | -2.9 | 70.7 | E177 silent |
| E178 2024-05-10 | decay | -2.8 | 67.9 | E178 silent |
| E179 2024-05-17 | reinforce | +5.1 | 72.9 | E179 Jason support x2 [w=1.05] |
| E180 2024-05-24 | decay | -2.9 | 70.0 | E180 silent |
| E181 2024-05-31 | decay | -2.8 | 67.2 | E181 silent |
| E182 2024-06-07 | reinforce | +5.3 | 72.5 | E182 Friedberg support x2 (flipped from oppose) [w=1.08] |
| E183 2024-06-14 | decay | -2.9 | 69.6 | E183 silent |
| E184 2024-06-20 | decay | -2.8 | 66.8 | E184 silent |
| E185 2024-06-29 | decay | -2.7 | 64.2 | E185 silent |
| E186 2024-07-04 | decay | -2.6 | 61.6 | E186 silent |
| E187 2024-07-12 | decay | -2.5 | 59.1 | E187 silent |
| E188 2024-07-19 | decay | -2.4 | 56.8 | E188 silent |
| E189 2024-07-26 | decay | -2.3 | 54.5 | E189 silent |
| E190 2024-08-02 | decay | -2.2 | 52.3 | E190 silent |
| E191 2024-08-09 | decay | -2.1 | 50.2 | E191 silent |
| E192 2024-08-16 | decay | -2.0 | 48.2 | E192 silent |
| E193 2024-08-23 | decay | -1.9 | 46.3 | E193 silent |
| E194 2024-08-30 | decay | -1.9 | 44.4 | E194 silent |
| E195 2024-09-06 | decay | -1.8 | 42.7 | E195 silent |
| E196 2024-09-20 | decay | -1.7 | 40.9 | E196 silent |
| E197 2024-09-27 | reinforce | +8.0 | 48.9 | E197 Chamath support x2 [w=0.90] |
| E198 2024-10-03 | decay | -2.0 | 47.0 | E198 silent |
| E199 2024-10-11 | decay | -1.9 | 45.1 | E199 silent |
| E200 2024-10-18 | decay | -1.8 | 43.3 | E200 silent |
| E201 2024-10-25 | decay | -1.7 | 41.6 | E201 silent |
| E202 2024-11-01 | decay | -1.7 | 39.9 | E202 silent |
| E203 2024-11-08 | decay | -1.6 | 38.3 | E203 silent |
| E204 2024-11-16 | decay | -1.5 | 36.8 | E204 silent |
| E205 2024-11-23 | decay | -1.5 | 35.3 | E205 silent |
| E206 2024-12-07 | decay | -1.4 | 33.9 | E206 silent |
| E207 2024-12-13 | decay | -1.4 | 32.5 | E207 silent |
| E208 2024-12-20 | decay | -1.3 | 31.2 | E208 silent |
| E209 2025-01-04 | decay | -1.2 | 30.0 | E209 silent |