← pool

🏛️ Harris surge is a vibes bump — Trump favored to win November

The post-Biden Harris surge is a media-manufactured sugar high rather than substance, and it fades as the campaign is forced to reveal policy. Sacks, Chamath and Jason converge over Aug-Sep 2024 on Trump being favored: the bounce settles back to trend, the electoral-college math points the 2016 way despite a popular-vote edge for the Democrat, and every wrong-track driver (inflation, economy, border, cultural fights) cuts Trump's way. Tradeable via DJT as the odds proxy.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 87.2 GREEN
WATCH
band
▲ LONG DJT
expression · bullish politics-market
RIGHT
result · return +21.9% · vs SPY +15.9%
2024-11-16
born 2024-08-16 (E192) → window closed

⚖ Why this result

fully deterministic — computed from daily closes on the scoring date; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2024-08-16 → 2024-11-16 — first mention + 3-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▲ LONG DJT (primary play). DJT rose 21.9% over the window → return (sign flipped for a SHORT) = +21.9% (the call made money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +6.0% → vs SPY = +21.9 − (+6.0) = +15.9% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the result uses.
  4. Rule fired:
    ▶ RIGHT — return ≥ +10% AND beat SPY by 5+ ✓ (return 21.9, vs SPY 15.9)
    · HALF — return ≥ +5% OR beat SPY at all
    · WRONG — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a RIGHT earn 1.0 each, opposers the opposite — this feeds the scoreboard. supported: Chamath, Jason, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2024-08-16)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▲ LONG DJTstock PRIMARY the listed proxy for Trump's election odds - a Harris correction reprices it up

Mention log newest first

Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E202 (2024-11-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:11:36 SUPPORT
“I think what the early voting data shows is something that you haven't seen in the past, which is that there are a lot of Republican people that are voting early.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E202 (2024-11-01) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:08:53 SUPPORT
“So it is looking good for Trump. And if you look at the numbers that Elon's group, that America PAC put out, it looks like the early voting in Pennsylvania is trending 500,000 votes better for Republicans in the early voting than four years ago.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E202 (2024-11-01) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:08:37 SUPPORT
“It's a toss-up. That's what everybody's saying. It looks like Trump's got a slight lead. So I think it's going to be a toss-up.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E201 (2024-10-25) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 57:20 OPPOSE
“So I would discount Polymarket a bit. It's probably not as extreme as it seems”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E201 (2024-10-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 54:06 SUPPORT
“All the data is basically pointing one direction, which is a Trump victory”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E201 (2024-10-25) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 10:57 SUPPORT
“this is now tilted overwhelmingly to a Trump win”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E200 (2024-10-18) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:16:49 SUPPORT
“Right now, the only candidate who looks like he could get a landslide is Trump. Otherwise, it's going to be very close. You're rooting for Trump if you want a landslide.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E200 (2024-10-18) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 6:25 SUPPORT
“From a substance perspective, it was pretty lacking because if you actually listen to the answers, there was just a ton of non-answers.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E199 (2024-10-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:18:43 SUPPORT
“which is why you're seeing the polls, at least the electoral college, which is really what matters at this point, turn Trump. So she's going to have a bit of an uphill fight between here and November.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E199 (2024-10-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:16:28 SUPPORT
“Clearly, there's been a huge swing towards Trump over the last week or two. And look, there's still 25 days to go, so anything can happen. I don't want to overstate this, but yeah, this is a good example right here, showing that Trump now has a lead in every swing state.”
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban (guest ×0.5) no politics-market track record · E198 (2024-10-03) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:33 OPPOSE
“Now, she's either even or ahead or a little bit behind in every single poll. Why do I bring it up? because it means what she's doing is working.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E196 (2024-09-20) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:19:24 SUPPORT
“I mean, I think maybe the real question is why is he favored to win? Because I think the polls, including Nate Stilver, still show him favored to win.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E196 (2024-09-20) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:17:57 SUPPORT
“So I think it's a pretty good chance that he's going to win, actually.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E195 (2024-09-06) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:25:19 SUPPORT
“being able to do a more nuanced look at the electoral college probability, which is in the opposite direction, favoring Donald Trump and not Kamala.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E195 (2024-09-06) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:14:37 SUPPORT
“She is the much weaker candidate. She's afraid to take questions on the tarmac. Trump is strong, he's authoritative, and I could see why they might prefer to have a President Harris than a President Trump.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E193 (2024-08-23) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 40:06 SUPPORT · horizon 3mo
“I think the more the public learns, the more we learn about what she would do as president, the worse she does. And they've now got to run out the clock for another 70, 80 days in terms of running a campaign that's substance free, that's just completely on vibes, that's about joy, without answering any questions, without doing any press interviews.”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market 51% · n=95 · E192 (2024-08-16) · sentiment · strength 1 ▶ 1:19:57 SUPPORT
“And in the middle of the relief rally that Biden isn't in the race. I think that we had a different version of a relief rally when everybody realized that President Trump hadn't been assassinated. So these are the pendulum swings, I think, of an electorate that still hasn't been given a clear definition of A or B.”
Jason
Jason politics-market 49% · n=61 · E192 (2024-08-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:14:47 OPPOSE
“Now, pragmatically, running out the clock as a strategy and not defining your positions too much and just selling the vibes is a brilliant strategy and it's working.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market 48% · n=87 · E192 (2024-08-16) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 1:12:19 SUPPORT · horizon 3mo
“And I think that now that she finally is putting out policy proposals that can be questioned or analyzed and criticized, I think this is going to be the beginning of, I would say, a big correction in her campaign.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total push on the score, in conviction points across every mention — supports and opposes · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Sacks
Sacks 48%
8 scoring events · 51% of moves
+75.7 → net +75.7
Chamath
Chamath 51%
6 scoring events · 23% of moves
+34.9 → net +34.9
Jason
Jason 49%
4 scoring events · 22% of moves
+9.0 / -24.0 → net -15.0
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban guest ×0.5
1 scoring event · 4% of moves
+0.0 / -6.0 → net -6.0

⏳ decay drained -11.4 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E192 2024-08-16 init +35.0 35.0 E192 born by Sacks (explicit_prediction x2)
E192 2024-08-16 oppose -12.0 23.0 E192 Jason opposes x2
E192 2024-08-16 reinforce +13.9 36.9 E192 Chamath support x1 (new voice)
E193 2024-08-23 reinforce +11.4 48.2 E193 Sacks support x3
E194 2024-08-30 decay -1.9 46.3 E194 silent
E195 2024-09-06 reinforce +6.4 52.7 E195 Sacks support x1
E195 2024-09-06 reinforce +7.1 59.8 E195 Chamath support x2
E196 2024-09-20 reinforce +6.0 65.9 E196 Jason support x2 (flipped from oppose)
E196 2024-09-20 reinforce +5.1 71.0 E196 Sacks support x2
E197 2024-09-27 decay -2.8 68.1 E197 silent
E198 2024-10-03 oppose -6.0 62.1 E198 Mark Cuban opposes x2 [w=0.50]
E199 2024-10-11 reinforce +6.8 69.0 E199 Sacks support x3
E199 2024-10-11 reinforce +4.7 73.6 E199 Chamath support x2
E200 2024-10-18 reinforce +3.2 76.8 E200 Chamath support x1
E200 2024-10-18 reinforce +4.2 81.0 E200 Sacks support x3
E201 2024-10-25 reinforce +3.4 84.4 E201 Chamath support x3
E201 2024-10-25 reinforce +2.8 87.2 E201 Sacks support x3
E201 2024-10-25 oppose -12.0 75.2 E201 Jason opposes x2
E202 2024-11-01 reinforce +3.0 78.2 E202 Jason support x1 (flipped from oppose)
E202 2024-11-01 reinforce +3.9 82.1 E202 Sacks support x3
E202 2024-11-01 reinforce +2.7 84.8 E202 Chamath support x2
E203 2024-11-08 decay -3.4 81.4 E203 silent
E204 2024-11-16 decay -3.3 78.1 E204 silent