📈 Legacy defense primes (Boeing, Lockheed, RTX) lose 2025
Defense budgets shift to tech-oriented, ROI-driven spend (Palantir/Anduril world); the clunky cost-plus primes — Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon — are deeply challenged in 2025.
0
CONVICTION
peaked 78.6 GREEN
EMBER
band
▼ SHORT BA
expression · bearish equities
MISS
outcome · R -33.4% · α -49.5%
2026-01-04
window closed
⚖ Why this verdict
fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set
- Window: 2025-01-04 → 2026-01-04 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
- The call: ▼ SHORT BA (primary play). BA rose 33.4% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -33.4% (the call lost money).
- Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +16.1%
→ α = -33.4 − (+16.1) = -49.5%
— what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
Stock-selection read: -17.3% — did BA move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
- Rule fired:
· HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5· PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0▶ MISS — everything else
- Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Cyan Banister, Friedberg, Joe Lonsdale
Conviction timeline
bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15
Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2025-01-04)
Plays
| expression | symbol | kind | relevance | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▼ SHORT | BA | stock | PRIMARY | first-named |
| ▼ SHORT | LMT | stock | adjacent | named |
| ▼ SHORT | RTX | stock | adjacent | named (Raytheon) |
Mention log
Friedberg
equities w=0.87 · n=120
· E209 (2025-01-04) · annual_prediction · strength 2
▶ 41:27
SUPPORT
· horizon 12mo
“I went with the old defense and aerospace providers — Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon... defense budgets are going to shift towards a more tech-oriented and ROI-driven rationalization... this government contracting business is going to be deeply challenged this year.”
Chamath
equities w=0.84 · n=160
· E215 (2025-02-15) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 37:54
SUPPORT
“So on Thursday, what happened with Microsoft, they had a $24 billion contract with the United States Army to deliver some whiz-bang thing. And they realized that they couldn't deliver it. And so what did they do? They went to Anderil. Now, why did they go to Anderil? Because Anderil has the technological supremacy to actually execute.”
NA
Naval Ravikant
(guest ×0.5)
no equities track record
· E215 (2025-02-15) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 1:18:39
SUPPORT
“If you look at it today, probably the largest defense contractor in the world is DJI. They got all the drones. ... If we have a kinetic conflict right now and we don't have good drone supply chain internally in the US, we're probably going to lose because those things are autonomous bullets. That's the future of all warfare. We're buying F-35s and the Chinese are building swarms of narrowzones.”
Chamath
equities w=0.84 · n=160
· E216 (2025-02-21) · explicit_prediction · strength 3
▶ 35:23
SUPPORT
“you can't be spending three or four billion dollars a boat and taking eight, nine, 10 years to build these things. This is not sustainable... What you have instead are system integrators with extremely deep connectivity that are able to contract well, not necessarily to invent well.”
Friedberg
equities w=0.87 · n=120
· E216 (2025-02-21) · explicit_prediction · strength 3
▶ 38:07
SUPPORT
“We've seen it in the Ukraine-Russia context that a $10,000 drone can destroy a $10 million piece of equipment and China now has drone factories that can output millions of drones each month... do we really need aircraft carriers? Do we really need tanks?”
JO
Joe Lonsdale
(regular guest ×1.0)
equities: 4 resolved, unproven
· E218 (2025-03-08) · explicit_prediction · strength 3
▶ 34:07
SUPPORT
“We had a big contest four years ago, L3, Raytheon, Northrop. These guys, in and out of government for decades, they've gotten tens of billions of dollars to the same technology area. When we went head to head with them, we didn't just beat them by a little bit. We shot down the hardened drones nine and a half times farther away. Same size, same power, nine and a half times. Completely wiped the floor.”
CY
Cyan Banister
(regular guest ×1.0)
equities w=1.00 · n=5
· E220 (2025-03-22) · sentiment · strength 2
▶ 1:15:18
SUPPORT
“Well, obviously, Boeing is the big loser here. You've got to, it's interesting to me how bad they just fumbled this.”
Friedberg
equities w=0.87 · n=120
· E220 (2025-03-22) · explicit_prediction · strength 2
▶ 1:13:49
SUPPORT
“And so having spent far more on the Starliner program than on the Crew Dragon program, the Starliner program is gone now. It's basically done. And the Crew Dragon program has now done 16 crewed flights to space, 11 for NASA, four private commercial flights, and continues to perform.”
Who built this conviction
each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement
⏳ decay drained -71.5 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one
Score events
| episode | kind | Δ | after | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E209 2025-01-04 | init | +34.7 | 34.7 | E209 born by Friedberg (annual_prediction x2) [w=0.87] |
| E210 2025-01-11 | decay | -1.4 | 33.3 | E210 silent |
| E211 2025-01-18 | decay | -1.3 | 31.9 | E211 silent |
| E212 2025-01-25 | decay | -1.3 | 30.7 | E212 silent |
| E213 2025-01-31 | decay | -1.2 | 29.4 | E213 silent |
| E214 2025-02-07 | decay | -1.2 | 28.3 | E214 silent |
| E215 2025-02-15 | reinforce | +13.5 | 41.8 | E215 Chamath support x2 (new voice) [w=0.84] |
| E215 2025-02-15 | reinforce | +6.5 | 48.3 | E215 Naval Ravikant support x2 (new voice) [w=0.50] |
| E216 2025-02-21 | reinforce | +7.8 | 56.1 | E216 Chamath support x3 [w=0.84] |
| E216 2025-02-21 | reinforce | +6.8 | 63.0 | E216 Friedberg support x3 [w=0.87] |
| E217 2025-03-01 | decay | -2.5 | 60.4 | E217 silent |
| E218 2025-03-08 | reinforce | +10.7 | 71.1 | E218 Joe Lonsdale support x3 (new voice) |
| E219 2025-03-15 | decay | -2.8 | 68.3 | E219 silent |
| E220 2025-03-22 | reinforce | +4.1 | 72.4 | E220 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.87] |
| E220 2025-03-22 | reinforce | +6.2 | 78.6 | E220 Cyan Banister support x2 (new voice) |
| E221 2025-03-29 | decay | -3.1 | 75.5 | E221 silent |
| E222 2025-04-05 | decay | -3.0 | 72.5 | E222 silent |
| E223 2025-04-11 | decay | -2.9 | 69.6 | E223 silent |
| E224 2025-04-19 | decay | -2.8 | 66.8 | E224 silent |
| E225 2025-04-26 | decay | -2.7 | 64.1 | E225 silent |
| E226 2025-05-02 | decay | -2.6 | 61.5 | E226 silent |
| E227 2025-05-09 | decay | -2.5 | 59.1 | E227 silent |
| E228 2025-05-17 | decay | -2.4 | 56.7 | E228 silent |
| E229 2025-05-24 | decay | -2.3 | 54.4 | E229 silent |
| E231 2025-06-13 | decay | -2.2 | 52.3 | E231 silent |
| E232 2025-06-21 | decay | -2.1 | 50.2 | E232 silent |
| E233 2025-06-28 | decay | -2.0 | 48.2 | E233 silent |
| E234 2025-07-04 | decay | -1.9 | 46.2 | E234 silent |
| E235 2025-07-11 | decay | -1.8 | 44.4 | E235 silent |
| E236 2025-07-19 | decay | -1.8 | 42.6 | E236 silent |
| E237 2025-08-01 | decay | -1.7 | 40.9 | E237 silent |
| E238 2025-08-09 | decay | -1.6 | 39.3 | E238 silent |
| E239 2025-08-15 | decay | -1.6 | 37.7 | E239 silent |
| E240 2025-08-22 | decay | -1.5 | 36.2 | E240 silent |
| E241 2025-08-29 | decay | -1.4 | 34.7 | E241 silent |
| E242 2025-09-07 | decay | -1.4 | 33.4 | E242 silent |
| E243 2025-09-19 | decay | -1.3 | 32.0 | E243 silent |
| E244 2025-09-27 | decay | -1.3 | 30.7 | E244 silent |
| E245 2025-10-03 | decay | -1.2 | 29.5 | E245 silent |
| E246 2025-10-10 | decay | -1.2 | 28.3 | E246 silent |
| E247 2025-10-17 | decay | -1.1 | 27.2 | E247 silent |
| E248 2025-10-24 | decay | -1.1 | 26.1 | E248 silent |
| E249 2025-10-31 | decay | -1.0 | 25.1 | E249 silent |
| E250 2025-11-07 | decay | -1.0 | 24.1 | E250 silent |
| E251 2025-11-14 | decay | -1.0 | 23.1 | E251 silent |
| E252 2025-11-22 | decay | -0.9 | 22.2 | E252 silent |
| E253 2025-12-06 | decay | -0.9 | 21.3 | E253 silent |
| E254 2025-12-13 | decay | -0.9 | 20.4 | E254 silent |
| E255 2025-12-19 | decay | -0.8 | 19.6 | E255 silent |
| E256 2025-12-31 | decay | -0.8 | 18.8 | E256 silent |