← pool

📈 California's suppressed insurance rates break the market and land on the taxpayer

State insurance commissioners hold homeowner rates below what CAT models say the risk is worth, so carriers cancel policies and exit California, leaving the state-run FAIR Plan grossly under-capitalised (~$220M of capital plus ~$5B of reinsurance against ~$6B of Pacific Palisades exposure alone) against the LA wildfire losses. The bill gets eaten by the insurers, the state or the federal taxpayer, and property in fire- and coast-exposed zones has to reprice down because rebuild economics stop penciling once insurance is priced at true risk.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 72.8 GREEN
DORMANT
band
▼ SHORT KIE
expression · bearish equities
MISS
outcome · R -11.3% · α -32.1%
2026-01-11
window closed

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2025-01-11 → 2026-01-11 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT KIE (primary play). KIE rose 11.3% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -11.3% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +20.8%α = -11.3 − (+20.8) = -32.1% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: +9.4% — did KIE move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: Chamath, Cyan Banister, Friedberg, Jason

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2025-01-11)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT KIEetf PRIMARY P&C insurance sector carrying suppressed-rate California catastrophe exposure
▼ SHORT ALLstock adjacent large California personal-lines book stuck behind CA DOI rate approval
▼ SHORT MCYstock adjacent Mercury General — LA-based insurer with the most concentrated California homeowners/wildfire book

Mention log

Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E210 (2025-01-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 58:56 SUPPORT
“They're driving real estate value up because they're not allowing the cost of insurance of that real estate to naturally float. And so by driving real estate values up, the economy looks good, they make property taxes, income comes in, but at the end of the day, the bill is going to come due. And in the case of Florida and in the case of California, either the state government or the federal government is going to step in and pay the difference.”
Chamath
Chamath equities w=0.84 · n=160 · E210 (2025-01-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 42:18 SUPPORT
“So the individual homeowner is not going to be in a position to rebuild. I think that the liabilities of the insurance claims are going to be so massive that the state is going to look to the federal government to build them out.”
CY
Cyan Banister (regular guest ×1.0) equities w=1.00 · n=5 · E210 (2025-01-11) · positioning · strength 2 ▶ 44:20 SUPPORT
“And so the free market solution is the only solution. If you look at I have an investment in a company called Kin Insurance, and they specialize in direct to consumer insurance for areas that are plagued with natural disasters... So you're not allowed to use a weather model to price in, you know, your decision making for insurance in this state. And that just doesn't make a lot of sense.”
Jason
Jason equities w=0.97 · n=105 · E210 (2025-01-11) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 43:24 SUPPORT
“But to the question of who is responsible, it is economically going to make no sense to rebuild unless you can get that insurance. It is a coveted place to live. But because of the construction costs have gone absolutely parabolic in California, because of regulations, you're talking about $14 million in income to build a $7 million house.”
Friedberg
Friedberg equities w=0.87 · n=120 · E211 (2025-01-18) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 27:35 SUPPORT
“Well, California has got, at this point, price controls or a mechanism for controlling the change in price on insurance, on housing services. And now they've got this non-solicitation rule. All three, I think, are very challenging to, I think, an appropriate market recovery. ... But I think it's going to be one of the biggest burdens going forward and it could actually lead to a pretty significant effect in long-term housing prices in California. Because of the way that the insurance market is structured and regulated in California.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.87
2 scoring events · 56% of moves
+40.5 → net +40.5
Chamath
Chamath w=0.84
1 scoring event · 16% of moves
+12.0 → net +12.0
Jason
Jason w=0.97
1 scoring event · 15% of moves
+11.3 → net +11.3
CY
Cyan Banister w=1.00 regular guest ×1.0
1 scoring event · 12% of moves
+9.1 → net +9.1

⏳ decay drained -61.2 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E210 2025-01-11 init +36.4 36.4 E210 born by Friedberg (explicit_prediction x3) [w=0.87]
E210 2025-01-11 reinforce +12.0 48.4 E210 Chamath support x2 (new voice) [w=0.84]
E210 2025-01-11 reinforce +11.3 59.7 E210 Jason support x2 (new voice) [w=0.97]
E210 2025-01-11 reinforce +9.1 68.7 E210 Cyan Banister support x2 (new voice)
E211 2025-01-18 reinforce +4.1 72.8 E211 Friedberg support x2 [w=0.87]
E212 2025-01-25 decay -2.9 69.9 E212 silent
E213 2025-01-31 decay -2.8 67.1 E213 silent
E214 2025-02-07 decay -2.7 64.4 E214 silent
E215 2025-02-15 decay -2.6 61.8 E215 silent
E216 2025-02-21 decay -2.5 59.4 E216 silent
E217 2025-03-01 decay -2.4 57.0 E217 silent
E218 2025-03-08 decay -2.3 54.7 E218 silent
E219 2025-03-15 decay -2.2 52.5 E219 silent
E220 2025-03-22 decay -2.1 50.4 E220 silent
E221 2025-03-29 decay -2.0 48.4 E221 silent
E222 2025-04-05 decay -1.9 46.5 E222 silent
E223 2025-04-11 decay -1.9 44.6 E223 silent
E224 2025-04-19 decay -1.8 42.8 E224 silent
E225 2025-04-26 decay -1.7 41.1 E225 silent
E226 2025-05-02 decay -1.6 39.5 E226 silent
E227 2025-05-09 decay -1.6 37.9 E227 silent
E228 2025-05-17 decay -1.5 36.4 E228 silent
E229 2025-05-24 decay -1.5 34.9 E229 silent
E231 2025-06-13 decay -1.4 33.5 E231 silent
E232 2025-06-21 decay -1.3 32.2 E232 silent
E233 2025-06-28 decay -1.3 30.9 E233 silent
E234 2025-07-04 decay -1.2 29.7 E234 silent
E235 2025-07-11 decay -1.2 28.5 E235 silent
E236 2025-07-19 decay -1.1 27.3 E236 silent
E237 2025-08-01 decay -1.1 26.2 E237 silent
E238 2025-08-09 decay -1.0 25.2 E238 silent
E239 2025-08-15 decay -1.0 24.2 E239 silent
E240 2025-08-22 decay -1.0 23.2 E240 silent
E241 2025-08-29 decay -0.9 22.3 E241 silent
E242 2025-09-07 decay -0.9 21.4 E242 silent
E243 2025-09-19 decay -0.9 20.5 E243 silent
E244 2025-09-27 decay -0.8 19.7 E244 silent
E245 2025-10-03 decay -0.8 18.9 E245 silent
E246 2025-10-10 decay -0.8 18.2 E246 silent
E247 2025-10-17 decay -0.7 17.4 E247 silent
E248 2025-10-24 decay -0.7 16.7 E248 silent
E249 2025-10-31 decay -0.7 16.1 E249 silent
E250 2025-11-07 decay -0.6 15.4 E250 silent
E251 2025-11-14 decay -0.6 14.8 E251 silent
E252 2025-11-22 decay -0.6 14.2 E252 silent
E253 2025-12-06 decay -0.6 13.7 E253 silent
E254 2025-12-13 decay -0.5 13.1 E254 silent
E255 2025-12-19 decay -0.5 12.6 E255 silent
E256 2025-12-31 decay -0.5 12.1 E256 silent
E257 2026-01-10 decay -0.5 11.6 E257 silent