+0.0
net board stance
what this means
399.11
+0.5% · close 2026-09-08
-2% / -3% / +28%
1m / 3m / 12m
-69%
vs SPY since 2024-08-16
79%
of 52w range · -8.5% off high
1/1
hit rate as primary · α +35
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on UNH
As a PRIMARY play the besties are 1 hit / 0 partial / 0 miss over 1 closed window — credit 1.0, average α +35.1. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 PBM margin model breaks on drug-price transparency | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | MISS | -28.8% | -48.1 | 2025-10-03 |
| 🏛️ PBMs, not pharma, are the real drug-price target | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | PARTIAL | +13.9% | -14.4 | 2024-05-19 |
| 🏛️ Regulatory and IP capture keeps US healthcare incumbents' rents intact | ▲ LONG | primary | HIT | +25.2% | +35.1 | 2022-09-14 |
| 🤖 Models commoditize — proprietary data is the only AI moat | ▲ LONG | adjacent | HIT | +96.7% | +18.4 | 2025-12-03 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding UNH, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
Grok 5 and for sure Grok 6 will not use Common Crawl. It will not use the Internet. It'll just be an enormous amount of synthetic data.
KE
Keith Rabois
oppose ×2
▲ on
🤖 Models commoditize — proprietary data is the only AI moat
E235 · 2025-07-11
▶ 28:49
The most important thing I think as a VC that you said, as we've been debating for years, should we invest in companies like Scale, or WorkCore, or any of these surge? The truth is, I think there's a very short half-life on human-label data. And so, everybody who's investing in these companies, just looking at revenue traction, really didn't understand that there may be a year, two years, three years max, when anybody uses human-label data for maybe anything.
That has huge implications because if you think about all these other companies, what has Lama been doing? They just spent 15 billion to buy 49% of scale AI. That's exactly a bet on human knowledge. What is Gemini doing? What is OpenAI doing? What is Anthropic doing? So all these things come into question.
This is great service. A lot of people rely on it. He buys it, shuts it down for everybody else, gets the tool for himself, gets the data for himself.
TH
Thomas Laffont
support ×2
▲ on
🤖 Models commoditize — proprietary data is the only AI moat
E232 · 2025-06-21
▶ 13:06
Onavo was a small data service provider, but what it did is it had a panel of phones, and we as investors could see which apps people were using, and the data was incredibly valuable because it was the only service that gave you true engagement data. ... Eventually, it sold to Facebook, and Facebook used it internally and didn't allow anybody else to use it.
So there's a lot of other organizations in this value chain that kind of eat out of that dollar before it gets to the sense that goes to pharma. And so it's important to make sure we don't overlook those. The biggest ones being the PBMs.
There's three major PBMs, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts and Optum RX. These three companies make on average approximately three bucks in operating profit per prescription claim processed. They make money in markups.
They have such a data advantage and such a deep integration into people's lives because they use three or four services.
TR
Travis Kalanick
support ×2
▲ on
🤖 Models commoditize — proprietary data is the only AI moat
E213 · 2025-01-31
▶ 1:09:24
At some point, the amount of data becomes the long pole in the tent. At some point, the quality of the algorithms becomes a long pole in the tent, and more compute is not going to change that.
Tesla has an extraordinary advantage that they were really pressure to put cameras on everything years ago, and that gives them this ability to build models that do self-driving. So I think that there's a lot more data advantage that arises in certain industry segments than others, and that's where the moat will lie, and that moat will allow you to actually build better products that get you a more persistent advantage in gathering more data.
And the actual advantage is going to be in the IP and owning content. And the really smart thing to do would be for somebody to go by Reddit, Quora, the New York Times, the Washington Post and Disney and take all that IP and then not allow other people to use it, sue the hell out of them every time they try.
So the problem that Expedia has is the same that booking and a bunch of these other folks have, which is that the principal heartbeat of the company, flight information and other things, are licensed to them by third parties. And so what they are is a UI and a front door.
MA
Mark Cuban
support ×3
▼ on
📈 PBM margin model breaks on drug-price transparency
E198 · 2024-10-03
▶ 1:43:45
And by working, by requiring transparency in all contracts, signed by anybody anywhere in terms of pricing, you are going to see the same impact on across-the-board pricing of a decrease of 30-40 percent. And so all that is going to reduce out-of-pocket spending for everybody, reduce government spending for everybody, and have a net positive impact.
The third piece is that all of these models basically run out of viable data to differentiate themselves, and it basically becomes a race around synthetic information and synthetic data, which is a cost problem.
RE
Reid Hoffman
oppose ×2
▲ on
🤖 Models commoditize — proprietary data is the only AI moat
E194 · 2024-08-30
▶ 26:58
we're going to create synthetic data, we're going to do all kinds of other things that are going to mean that no one's particular data is really going to matter
foundational models are quickly becoming a consumer surplus. Every model is roughly the same. They keep getting better and better, but they're also approaching these asymptotic returns.
And having all this local data is a huge advantage for Apple. They've got your messages, your phone, your calendar, your photos, your app behavior, the data inside of your wallet. All of this gives them a huge, huge advantage.
Don't you agree that the data set is not so cool? Uber has the data. DoorDash has the data.
because you have this data on your phone, all your iMessages, all your documents, all your photos, videos, music collection, there's a unique set of data on that phone to make your personal LLM that's going to do extraordinary things for you
SA
Sam Altman
oppose ×2
▲ on
🤖 Models commoditize — proprietary data is the only AI moat
E178 · 2024-05-10
▶ 12:31
I definitely don't think it will be an arms race for data because when the models get smart enough at some point, it shouldn't be about more data, at least not for training.
the accuracy or the value of these models will probably shift to these proprietary sources of training data that you could get that others can't
you have probably the most prolific set of training data that has ever been created in the entire world to make these models kick ass
Because I think that there's a great deal of capability that emerges in the fine-tuning and the unique data that certain people may have to make that one tool better than the rest. And therefore, everyone will end up using this one lawyer service or this one accounting service or what have you.
I think the open Internet has enough data that there isn't going to be a monopoly on information by someone spending money for content from third parties.
aren't you worried that somebody with an agenda and a balance sheet could now basically gobble up all kinds of training data that make all models crappy? And then they basically put their layer of interpretation on critical information for people?