+0.0
net board stance
what this means
17.66
+0.1% · close 2026-09-08
+5% / +18% / +2%
1m / 3m / 12m
-32%
vs SPY since 2023-10-27
99%
of 52w range · -0.4% off high
0/1
hit rate as primary · α -130
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on HTGC
As a PRIMARY play the besties are 0 hit / 0 partial / 1 miss over 1 closed window — credit 0.0, average α -129.5. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Venture debt's loss models break - deferred defaults land on the lenders | ▼ SHORT | primary | MISS | -78.5% | -129.5 | 2025-02-04 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding HTGC, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
Moreover, I always try to talk founders out of taking venture debt, whether from SVB or elsewhere.
And this is exactly what happened in 2008, when people started giving those no recourse or no background check mortgages. Remember those? Where like you didn't have to do a background check to get a mortgage? That's what happened in venture. They just gave these, I saw it firsthand, willy-nilly.
I get it, but the asset as an asset class, we can make fun of it all we want. It's actually performed pretty well. These guys have generated typically 18% as an industry kind of returns.
So after the conversation we had on the show about venture debt, I'm like, I don't really like that SVB is in this business. So I told my guys, set up an account somewhere else.
So look, I just wonder what I don't trust is whether the return models on venture debt that were created over the last five to 10 years will be a good predictor of what the returns will be in the next five to 10 years when a lot of the mortality that should have happened in the past now happens in the future.
On top of all this inefficiency is a dependence on venture debt. I don't know if you're seeing this, Sacks, but the amount of focus on adding debt to unprofitable companies over the last five years has been just extraordinary.