MATX

Matson, Inc.

stock all instruments
+0.0
net board stance what this means
224.58
-0.4% · close 2026-09-08
+9% / +16% / +117%
1m / 3m / 12m
+32%
vs SPY since 2024-10-11
99%
of 52w range · -0.4% off high
0/1
hit rate as primary · α -84

Where we stand — 0 live ideas

No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.

Where the winds are blowing

NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES — rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the talk lead the tape or follow it?

Who's pushing which way

each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means

Sacks
Sacks w=1.12 macro
2 ideas (0 live) · last heard E226
+4
pushes up
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.93 macro
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E161
+2
pushes up
Chamath
Chamath w=1.06 macro
2 ideas (0 live) · last heard E221
-1
pushes down
RY
Ryan Petersen w=1.17 equities guest ×1.0
3 ideas (0 live) · last heard E226
-2
pushes down
Jason
Jason w=0.97 equities
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E228
-2
pushes down
AA
Aaron Levie guest ×1.0
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E226
-2
pushes down

Track record on MATX

As a PRIMARY play the besties are 0 hit / 0 partial / 1 miss over 1 closed window — credit 0.0, average α -83.9. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.

ideacallplayverdictRαclosed
🌍 Red Sea blockade spikes freight rates and re-ignites goods inflation ▲ LONG adjacent HIT +154.2% +127.6 2024-12-23
📈 Trans-Pacific container volume collapse seizes up the physical logistics economy ▼ SHORT primary MISS -55.3% -83.9 2026-05-02
🌍 Red Sea reopening contains the freight-driven inflation impulse ▼ SHORT adjacent MISS -93.8% -108.4 2026-03-29
📈 Ocean freight stays broken - capacity shrinks again and rates go higher ▲ LONG adjacent MISS -47.8% -41.5 2023-02-05

The tape — what was actually said

every capture on any idea holding MATX, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode

Jason Jason support ×2 ▼ on 📈 Trans-Pacific container volume collapse seizes up the physical logistics economy E228 · 2025-05-17 ▶ 45:39
we were sitting here a couple weeks ago and as I was mentioning, I know a lot of e-commerce folks and they were saying, layoffs coming, we don't have predictability.
Sacks Sacks oppose ×2 ▼ on 📈 Trans-Pacific container volume collapse seizes up the physical logistics economy E226 · 2025-05-02 ▶ 58:20
Okay. I don't remember the shelves being empty, which is now the new panic the media is trying to create. So look, there's a lot of pant sweating that's occurring here that's being fueled by the media.
AA Aaron Levie support ×2 ▼ on 📈 Trans-Pacific container volume collapse seizes up the physical logistics economy E226 · 2025-05-02 ▶ 55:37
I think that you sort of phrase that we could do the research paper and we could do Aspen Institute as a bad thing, but also it could be a bad thing if you're the small business owner right now who has 30 employees and you just literally don't know what you're going to do next month.
Jason Jason support ×2 ▼ on 📈 Trans-Pacific container volume collapse seizes up the physical logistics economy E226 · 2025-05-02 ▶ 28:08
And according to the thread that you shared, somewhere around early June, we're going to expect warehouses trucking the entire supply chain maybe to start to seize up or layoffs.
RY Ryan Petersen support ×3 ▼ on 📈 Trans-Pacific container volume collapse seizes up the physical logistics economy E226 · 2025-05-02 ▶ 29:07
And what has happened is a 60% decline in bookings of ocean freight from China to the U S I mean, so that's really, really pretty dramatic, like probably exceeding what was expected.
Chamath Chamath support ×3 ▼ on 🌍 Red Sea reopening contains the freight-driven inflation impulse E221 · 2025-03-29 ▶ 54:32
And so what happened? Now all of a sudden, traffic is reset, volumes are back up. By the third week of March, which is where we are now, we're back to where they were even a year ago. The price of shipping is now contained. The inflation risk is contained. The productivity hit is contained.
Sacks Sacks support ×2 ▲ on 🌍 Red Sea blockade spikes freight rates and re-ignites goods inflation E161 · 2024-01-13 ▶ 6:17
it's having to go around the Horn of Africa, it's adding two or three weeks to the trip ... It's Europe and China who are impacted the most.
Chamath Chamath support ×2 ▲ on 🌍 Red Sea blockade spikes freight rates and re-ignites goods inflation E161 · 2024-01-13 ▶ 5:32
This is really an issue for Europe. It's not an issue for the United States because there are alternative routes. ... what we're really debating is what is the risk of inflation and a backup of goods and shipping rates into Europe?
Friedberg Friedberg support ×2 ▲ on 🌍 Red Sea blockade spikes freight rates and re-ignites goods inflation E161 · 2024-01-13 ▶ 5:21
I'm assuming shipping prices are going to go up, freight prices are going to go up.
Friedberg Friedberg support ×2 ▲ on 🌍 Red Sea blockade spikes freight rates and re-ignites goods inflation E158 · 2023-12-23 ▶ 33:55
the fact that the insurance companies won't insure the ship anymore means that now that ship can't travel and that's tens of millions of dollars of commerce that gets shut down off of a few thousand dollar investment. ... there are many other groups like this that may get emboldened and you start to see more activity in other regions as well
Chamath Chamath support ×2 ▲ on 🌍 Red Sea blockade spikes freight rates and re-ignites goods inflation E158 · 2023-12-23 ▶ 19:55
the really significant impacts are downstream to Europe consumer prices. So I think like European inflation has more chance of upticking again than America does
RY Ryan Petersen support ×3 ▲ on 🌍 Red Sea blockade spikes freight rates and re-ignites goods inflation E158 · 2023-12-23 ▶ 11:02
About 30% of all ocean container traffic flows through the Suez and through the Red Sea. ... So you're talking about a 20, 25% cut in shipping capacity on the 30% of all containers.
RY Ryan Petersen reversal ×2 ▲ on 📈 Ocean freight stays broken - capacity shrinks again and rates go higher E82 · 2022-05-24 ▶ 44:13
have actually ordered 25% more ships, increased the fleet by 25% over the next three years ... So it could be ugly the other way, real quick. You have too many ships and the ship owners can't make any money.
RY Ryan Petersen support ×3 ▲ on 📈 Ocean freight stays broken - capacity shrinks again and rates go higher E66 · 2022-02-05 ▶ 36:26
But it will reduce the supply of shipping capacity and slow everything down another 30 percent. That takes place January 1st, 2023 It's getting very little attention, but to my view, it's going to be massively disruptive if we slow everything down, reduce the capacity of the network that much further. Prices are going to go to the moon.