← pool

🏛️ Nvidia's Asia revenue is diverted China demand

Chamath's allegation off the H20 ban: roughly 47% of Nvidia's revenue ships to China and China-adjacent countries, much of it to entities stood up in Singapore, Vietnam, Cambodia and Bhutan that act as way-stations into the mainland, while Nvidia has re-engineered a just-compliant part (A800/H800/H20) at every rule change. Sacks confirms legal and illegal evasion of the controls is a fact and says BIS needs more monitoring, inspection and enforcement. If the boundary lines tighten and enforcement lands, a far larger slice of Nvidia's revenue base is at risk than the disclosed $5.5B H20 charge.

0 CONVICTION
peaked 65.3 GREEN
DORMANT
band · contested
▼ SHORT NVDA
expression · bearish politics-market
MISS
outcome · R -108.2% · α -147.9%
2026-04-19
window closed
⚠ CONFLICTING IDEAS ON THE SAME TICKER — the board is arguing with itself; net it before trading (ticker view →)
NVDA · AI compute capex supercycle has 12-24 months of runway LONG GREEN 86.6 ← stronger than this idea (0.0)
SMH · AI compute capex supercycle has 12-24 months of runway LONG GREEN 86.6 ← stronger than this idea (0.0)
NVDA · Nvidia + Hugging Face makes NVDA the open-source AI champion LONG WATCH 57.9 ← stronger than this idea (0.0)
SMH · Nvidia + Hugging Face makes NVDA the open-source AI champion LONG WATCH 57.9 ← stronger than this idea (0.0)
SMH · DRAM/HBM: the bottleneck that matters LONG EMBER 44.9 ← stronger than this idea (0.0)

also touching these tickers, same direction: Nvidia risk: special-purpose silicon + Huawei 10 (NVDA)

⚖ Why this verdict

fully deterministic — evaluate.py replays this from daily closes; nothing below is editable or hand-set

  1. Window: 2025-04-19 → 2026-04-19 — first mention + 12-month horizon, then the window locks.
  2. The call: ▼ SHORT NVDA (primary play). NVDA rose 108.2% over the window → direction-adjusted R = -108.2% (the call lost money).
  3. Benchmark: holding SPY over the same window returned +39.8%α = -108.2 − (+39.8) = -147.9% — what this call made or lost against just owning the index. This is the number the verdict uses.
    Stock-selection read: -68.4% — did NVDA move the predicted way relative to the market. The two only differ on a SHORT: this call was right about direction relative to the index but still cost money versus holding it.
  4. Rule fired:
    · HIT — R ≥ +10% AND α ≥ +5
    · PARTIAL — R ≥ +5% OR α ≥ 0
    ▶ MISS — everything else
  5. Credit: supporters of a MISS earn 0 each, opposers the inverse — this feeds the scoreboard weights. supported: nobody | opposed: Chamath, Jason, Sacks

Conviction timeline

bands: green ≥ 65 · watch ≥ 45 · ember ≥ 15

Plays vs SPY · % since first mention (2025-04-19)

Plays

expressionsymbolkindrelevancerationale
▼ SHORT NVDAstock PRIMARY the alleged 47% China-and-adjacent revenue concentration and the entity being accused of looking away
▼ SHORT SMHetf adjacent broad semi exposure to an export-control enforcement crackdown on Asia-routed AI silicon
▼ SHORT TSMstock adjacent Sacks cites TSMC being fined over ~3M dies that ended up in Huawei Ascend parts

Mention log

Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E224 (2025-04-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 14:20 SUPPORT
“About 47% of all of Nvidia's revenue goes to China and Chinese related countries. And I think when you peel back this onion, I think what you will find is a whole raft of companies that were stood up to buy these Nvidia GPUs to essentially act as a way station for China.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E224 (2025-04-19) · explicit_prediction · strength 2 ▶ 18:33 SUPPORT POLICY-ADJACENT
“So there have been attempts to set up shell companies to circumvent the export controls. And it is a very big problem.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E224 (2025-04-19) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 27:14 SUPPORT
“Taiwan and Vietnam do not have the need for that many domestically. They're obviously flipping them to someone, right?”
Chamath
Chamath politics-market w=1.02 · n=96 · E225 (2025-04-26) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 53:53 REVERSAL
“after we spoke about Nvidia, the Nvidia team reached out to me. And they were like, hey, Chamath, here's a bunch of stuff that will help you unpack what you spoke about in a little bit more detail. ... And what these guys educated me on is that they've been trying to refine how this is described, but it's not what it seems, meaning they report revenue on what's called the billing or the invoicing address. ... So it turns out that that's actually not where the silicon gets shipped. So there's a Singaporean office that handles the invoicing. So then I said, well, who are these companies that are using these places? And it turns out that it's a bunch of major US companies, including US OEMs and Clouds, that use Singapore for invoicing their suppliers.”
Sacks
Sacks politics-market w=0.97 · n=88 · E229 (2025-05-24) · explicit_prediction · strength 3 ▶ 1:06:17 OPPOSE POLICY-ADJACENT
“This idea that somehow they're going to get smuggled, it's like this totally fake concern that's been created. It's almost like a totally fake narrative.”
Jason
Jason politics-market w=1.00 · n=62 · E229 (2025-05-24) · sentiment · strength 2 ▶ 1:05:38 OPPOSE
“That makes no sense. These guys have unlimited resources. They have unlimited ambition. That's just a naive point of view. They want these for themselves.”

Who built this conviction

each voice's total force on the score — supports and opposes from every mention, weighted exactly as the replay applied them · share = % of all mention-driven movement

Chamath
Chamath w=1.02
2 scoring events · 64% of moves
+42.9 / -39.2 → net +3.7
Sacks
Sacks w=0.97
2 scoring events · 18% of moves
+12.4 / -11.1 → net +1.3
Jason
Jason w=1.00
2 scoring events · 17% of moves
+10.1 / -12.0 → net -1.9

⏳ decay drained -3.0 over the idea's life — that's time passing, attributed to no one

Score events

episodekindΔafternote
E224 2025-04-19 init +42.9 42.9 E224 born by Chamath (explicit_prediction x3) [w=1.02]
E224 2025-04-19 reinforce +12.4 55.3 E224 Sacks support x2 (new voice) [w=0.97]
E224 2025-04-19 reinforce +10.1 65.3 E224 Jason support x2 (new voice)
E225 2025-04-26 reversal -39.2 26.1 E225 Chamath flips
E226 2025-05-02 decay -1.0 25.1 E226 silent
E227 2025-05-09 decay -1.0 24.1 E227 silent
E228 2025-05-17 decay -1.0 23.1 E228 silent
E229 2025-05-24 oppose -12.0 11.1 E229 Jason opposes x2
E229 2025-05-24 oppose -11.1 0.0 E229 Sacks opposes x3 [w=0.97]
E231 2025-06-13 decay · 0.0 E231 silent
E232 2025-06-21 decay · 0.0 E232 silent
E233 2025-06-28 decay · 0.0 E233 silent
E234 2025-07-04 decay · 0.0 E234 silent
E235 2025-07-11 decay · 0.0 E235 silent
E236 2025-07-19 decay · 0.0 E236 silent
E237 2025-08-01 decay · 0.0 E237 silent
E238 2025-08-09 decay · 0.0 E238 silent
E239 2025-08-15 decay · 0.0 E239 silent
E240 2025-08-22 decay · 0.0 E240 silent
E241 2025-08-29 decay · 0.0 E241 silent
E242 2025-09-07 decay · 0.0 E242 silent
E243 2025-09-19 decay · 0.0 E243 silent
E244 2025-09-27 decay · 0.0 E244 silent
E245 2025-10-03 decay · 0.0 E245 silent
E246 2025-10-10 decay · 0.0 E246 silent
E247 2025-10-17 decay · 0.0 E247 silent
E248 2025-10-24 decay · 0.0 E248 silent
E249 2025-10-31 decay · 0.0 E249 silent
E250 2025-11-07 decay · 0.0 E250 silent
E251 2025-11-14 decay · 0.0 E251 silent
E252 2025-11-22 decay · 0.0 E252 silent
E253 2025-12-06 decay · 0.0 E253 silent
E254 2025-12-13 decay · 0.0 E254 silent
E255 2025-12-19 decay · 0.0 E255 silent
E256 2025-12-31 decay · 0.0 E256 silent
E257 2026-01-10 decay · 0.0 E257 silent
E258 2026-01-17 decay · 0.0 E258 silent
E259 2026-01-30 decay · 0.0 E259 silent
E260 2026-02-07 decay · 0.0 E260 silent
E261 2026-02-13 decay · 0.0 E261 silent
E262 2026-02-28 decay · 0.0 E262 silent
E263 2026-03-06 decay · 0.0 E263 silent
E264 2026-03-13 decay · 0.0 E264 silent
E265 2026-03-19 decay · 0.0 E265 silent
E266 2026-03-27 decay · 0.0 E266 silent
E267 2026-04-03 decay · 0.0 E267 silent
E268 2026-04-10 decay · 0.0 E268 silent
E269 2026-04-17 decay · 0.0 E269 silent