-12.7
net board stance
what this means
143.46
+1.1% · close 2026-09-08
+22% / +9% / +96%
1m / 3m / 12m
+79%
vs SPY since 2025-05-17
89%
of 52w range · -6.2% off high
1/2
hit rate as primary · α +4
Where we stand — 1 live idea
| idea | call | play | conviction | contributes | flag | eval in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🛢️ Hydrocarbons melt: oil sees $45 before $65 CONTESTED | ▼ SHORT | primary | 12.7 | -12.7 | — | 122d |
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
What resolves next
kill dates for the live ideas holding this ticker — each one turns into a scored verdict on that date, whether we like it or not
Track record on USO
As a PRIMARY play the besties are 1 hit / 0 partial / 1 miss over 2 closed windows — credit 0.5, average α +4.1. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ The 2024 black swan is a wider Middle East war and an oil shock | ▲ LONG | primary | MISS | +4.1% | -22.6 | 2024-12-23 |
| 🏛️ Ukraine's position is unsustainable - the front collapses next year | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | MISS | -46.1% | -70.4 | 2025-12-16 |
| 🏛️ US-Russia proxy war escalates horizontally | ▲ LONG | adjacent | HIT | +42.1% | +28.0 | 2025-07-04 |
| ⚡ An Iran engagement escalates, doubles oil and derails the agenda | ▲ LONG | primary | HIT | +56.4% | +30.7 | 2026-06-13 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding USO, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
China has been smoothing the energy consumption globally ... we've kind of kept a damper on $200 a barrel oil. In fact, we're sub $100. ... If China somehow runs out of reserves and they need to go back into the spot market and buy an extra 3 million barrels a day, there's a very big risk that oil gets into the well past 100, and maybe between 150 and 200 a barrel.
My suspicion is that these impacts are shorter duration... The United States produces 20 million barrels of oil a day and we consume 20 million barrels a day. This is a modest problem for the United States.
The market literally took oil from $120 a barrel to $90 a barrel, almost in, ... there is no path to a sustained conflict. ... a coordinated release of about 400 million barrels
the trend in oil is inexorable, and it's down. ... on a per-barrel basis, I think it's more likely to see $45 than $65.
It double and triples down the ability to monetize oil and start to invest those returns in future projects that have a much better ROI. All of that leads to cheaper energy.
I don't think the Israelis are going to sit by quietly and allow this Iranian regime to continue to go out and build up a military that's constantly shouting death to Israel, death to the USA. And I think that they've taken their first shot and I don't think it's their last.
President Trump accomplished that. We're not in a forever war. We're not in a war with Iran.
I mean, you could see oil double, double. What happens to the economy of the world, of world GDP, of everything, of inflation. If you have oil at 100 bucks a barrel, 112 bucks a barrel, it's not good.
TU
Tucker Carlson
support ×2
▲ on
⚡ An Iran engagement escalates, doubles oil and derails the agenda
E231 · 2025-06-13
▶ 1:30:20
Their conventional weapons are fearsome and could do great damage to our allies, to Israel and to American assets in that area and also to energy production in countries that we rely on. So I think the downsides are really kind of overwhelming. I think a protracted, meaning anything over a day or two engagement with Iran would derail the Trump agenda and the presidency.
It's not a stalemate. Remember, I said on this podcast six months or a year ago that it was no longer a stalemate. It was a war of attrition in which the Ukrainians were now losing. And every single month now the Russians are taking more and more territory.
Does Putin not see that in a couple of weeks, a couple of months, there will be new leadership in the White House and there's going to be a path to a resolution here?
but we're talking about tens and hundreds of billions of dollars that we're giving on top of the risk of nuclear escalation. I just think it's absolutely crazy.
The bottom line is this war is escalating, it's escalating nowhere good and at some point soon, we're going to have to get off of this escalatory ladder or we're going to end up in a really disastrous place.
Chamath, you're right. I mean, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, all of America was huddled around their TV sets worried about what would happen. There is no similar concern in this day and age about the escalatory wars that are happening.
But we are fighting a potential nuclear threat on three fronts. How have we allowed this to happen? Russia, Iran, China.
And it's very clear, I think that Ukraine, within, it could be in the next month, it could be the next two months, it could be the next six months, I think they're eventually going to collapse.
And I really do agree with you, Friedberg, there is a non-trivially high probability, the highest it's ever been, that we are just bumbling and sleepwalking into a really bad situation we can't walk back from.
And if Hezbollah and Israel are in a full scale war with ground forces, it could be very easy for Iran to get pulled into it on Hezbollah's side. And if that happens, I think it's just inevitable that the United States will be pulled into this war.
I think there's going to be a big war. I think by the time the show airs, Israel's incursion into Lebanon is going to get bigger. It's going to escalate. And by next week, we could be in a full blown multinational war in the Middle East.
What we're on track for is, at some point, probably next year, Ukraine is going to collapse.
which could mean an increased escalation in conflict. And that's, I think, a real kind of point of concern. And that's the one of the black swan events I think that's still outstanding right now.
If you were to place odds on this, I'd say it's at least 50-50 that things escalate into a regional war.
Biden actually approved private contractors now going into Ukraine and starting to fight. Americans will be on the battlefield as of I think this was just a few days ago.
The Russians in response to that said we are no longer in a state of peace with the United States. They did not say we're in a state of war, but they said we're no longer in a state of peace. And the Russians have indicated that they may escalate horizontally by giving advanced weapons to our enemies. For example, they've talked about giving cruise missiles to the hoodies.
We have an adversary now with a quarter of a trillion dollars of excess cash who has no incentive to negotiate.