⚠ No price data
— delisted or never fetched, so any idea whose PRIMARY play is
this ticker can never be scored (it closes unresolvable, earning nobody credit).
+0.0
net board stance
what this means
—
hit rate as primary
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on RDFN
No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Mortgage rate lock-in freezes housing turnover | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | MISS | +2.8% | -25.5 | 2024-05-19 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding RDFN, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
That makes it harder to buy a house. Mortgage payments are higher... if there's fewer home sale transactions, that means the price of housing could come down. So there could be a correction in that market
It should be that you get a flat rate, $10,000 at a million, and then you get 10% over a million or something.
a lot of people will not list their home or sell it because that 6% might put them underwater.
No buyer would ever voluntarily agree to pay this massive commission. It's not worth it. So it's game over for the realtors if buyers are forced to pay their own brokers commission.
Is it going to change the profitability of a realtor? Pretty meaningfully, right?
I do project and I do expect that much of what is charged on a commission basis, on a percent of home value today, will change to being a fixed fee and a flat fee basis.
The settlement is likely to be that when you hire a broker, they will give you a form and you'll pick what percentage you want to pay. ... keep an eye on this one folks, because it's going to have a massive impact.
Here's how you'll know that the monopoly has ended, is when the buy side commission goes away.
if the monopoly breaks on the marketplace, then the business model will get competed away, and there will start to be a change here. And I think that this lawsuit and the settlement ultimately leads to a shift in the industry that could certainly benefit consumers, but could have a negative economic impact because of the number of people that depend on brokerage fees as their job.
if you sell your house, you lose your 3% mortgage. Now you have to get a new one at 8%. So everyone stopped trying to sell their house. The number of real estate transactions has gone down a lot
Mortgages, the rate now is approaching 8%. So no one can afford to sell their house, which has a 3% mortgage, and then buy a new one at 8%. So real estate transactions have cratered.
my only thought around housing was that very much just supporting what Sacks just said. We're in an incredibly untenable situation, mostly because as rates go up, mortgage applications go down and so what you're seeing is just the number of people trying to transact is very small and so the inventory is very small
if it's going to cost you 8% to buy a new house and it used to be 3% a couple of years ago... you can't afford to sell your current house and buy a new one because your current house is financed at 3%... So we're already seeing a huge reduction in the number of transactions in residential real estate... I think that as this washes through the system, you could see a big correction in the values of residential real estate, which is most people's main asset.
And then for the new one, you're going to lose your 3% mortgage and have to get a new one at 7%. So you're not going to buy anything like the house you currently have. So it freezes the market. It freezes mobility. I think over the last few years during COVID, you saw tremendous movement between states. I think that's going to slow down a lot now because people just can't afford to trade houses.