+0.0
net board stance
what this means
151.27
-1.5% · close 2026-09-08
+1% / +9% / +16%
1m / 3m / 12m
-6%
vs SPY since 2024-02-02
89%
of 52w range · -2.1% off high
—
hit rate as primary
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on PKW
No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Profitability plus buybacks is the setup for the tech turn | ▲ LONG | adjacent | HIT | +88.3% | +45.4 | 2024-10-27 |
| 📈 Crony managerialism: debt-funded buybacks and EPS-linked comp produce marginal companies | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | MISS | -28.4% | -51.7 | 2025-02-02 |
| 📈 Shrinking global equity float lifts prices regardless of fundamentals | ▲ LONG | adjacent | PARTIAL | +5.8% | +0.0 | 2025-04-12 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding PKW, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
corporations have gotten religion around cost-cutting and austerity and increasing earnings
The way executive comp typically works at the board level at public companies is you hire these comp consultants and the comp consultants come in and they use comparables, which basically means let's do what everyone else does.
Sundar being a hired gun, not having founder authority to your point, Friedberg
it's a really important sign that founder led companies with these voting rights, you know, have the ability to make these sorts of hard decisions that it might be very difficult for a management by committee group to make.
the global amount of total available equities to buy is shrinking... when the equity markets continue to shrink and there's fewer and fewer things to buy, prices will still go up irrespective of the underlying justification
And then what I'm hearing from a lot of executives is cutting these highly stock comped executives who also have big cash comp, cutting them, putting lieutenants in charge, and then moving more jobs to other locations where people don't expect stock based comp... So as everybody optimizes these businesses, I mean, Facebook even did a dividend.
I bet you if she got paid $1 in her health care and she had to get to $80 a share, I bet you that would be an $80 stock price.
Then you got crony capitalism. You got these companies that have been around for a hundred years. The value was created by people long dead. ... they pay themselves as much comp as they can possibly justify. Whether or not they create any value for the shareholder. That's what we saw at GM.
So right now what we are doing is we are not motivating CEOs to run great companies. We're motivating CEOs to understand financial arbitrage. The result will be crappier companies that diminish American exceptionalism. That is the only outcome.
And the only time really to buy shares back is when you think they're undervalued.
Does debt help an equity shareholder? It categorically does not. Under no world does it do that.
we've seen all the companies that went public, whether it's Airbnb or Uber, are now focused on ringing the cash register and being profitable.
public firms that are continuing to downsize are getting rewarded by the public market. Spotify just did a third layoff, 17%.
Dara Uber is reportedly planning buying back upwards of 20% of the Uber shares in the next five years ... I think it's the public market companies showing the path profitability, buying back stock