+0.0
net board stance
what this means
293.89
-1.5% · close 2026-09-08
+3% / +1% / +26%
1m / 3m / 12m
+62%
vs SPY since 2021-12-11
47%
of 52w range · -19.5% off high
—
hit rate as primary
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on CBOE
No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Gamified retail speculation overwhelms fundamental price-setting | ▲ LONG | adjacent | HIT | +116.0% | +108.2 | 2025-03-29 |
| 📈 Payment for order flow and market making survive the GameStop backlash | ▲ LONG | adjacent | HIT | +26.8% | +13.1 | 2022-02-13 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding CBOE, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
this is the I think the upside of crypto in some ways, also the upside of prize picks or gambling poker. It's the upside of Robinhood and Coinbase and all these things being available. This generation, generation bet, like they love to gamble these young kids.
they're actively trading on the side something, crypto, options, whatever. They're on Robinhood, they're using Coinbase
I call them gen bet because they just want to bet on themselves
the people who are betting on these things are not looking to get a 7% return or beat the average. I mean, they're looking to double their money in 48 hours.
It's basically a game where the Redditors, they bid up the stock to levels that realistically it's not worth that much.
I don't think that there's anything about the actual performance of the underlying business in the security that you are buying or selling when you are making a decision about whether or not to buy or sell this security.
they can get synthetically short. So they'll add leverage to this using all kinds of esoteric derivatives that other banks on Wall Street will happily sell them. And then when those are disclosed, then the Redditors can just pump it even more, which causes massive margin calls.
When you have a small float like this and a rabid group of people who are gambling, you will get your face ripped off.
when you look at the products that service the retail market, they've also become increasingly gamified. Robinhood is probably the best example of having built an incredibly good business by making things more like a game. ... on top of the whole movement to sort of allow individuals to monetize their own name and likeness via the stock market, which we just talked about, the second movement is that a lot of these things are becoming less financialized and more gamified. And so you just have many more participants. ... you can have a GameStop moment in any of these things. You can have these zero-day options run the stock to the moon.
And the populist revolt around this whole payment for order flow Robinhood thing broke against the rock of Ken Griffin.
VL
Vlad Tenev
support ×2
▲ on
📈 Payment for order flow and market making survive the GameStop backlash
E22 · 2021-02-13
▶ 37:27
I do think exchanges are here to stay. Market making is here to stay. Market making is a profitable enterprise. And so some level of revenue share between the market maker and the broker makes sense. And it is regulated. So I'm not quite sure what, if any, changes need to come.