+0.0
net board stance
what this means
259.44
-1.2% · close 2026-09-08
-9% / -7% / -13%
1m / 3m / 12m
-46%
vs SPY since 2021-12-17
5%
of 52w range · -21.0% off high
—
hit rate as primary
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on VMC
No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏛️ Infrastructure trillions get captured by the contractors | ▲ LONG | adjacent | HIT | +13.9% | +8.6 | 2023-04-01 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding VMC, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
There's a term in Washington, which is called the Christmas tree bill. And the infrastructure bill is an example of that, which is this is not a directed shot on goal. What this is is a random tree that you go and hang little things on top of. ... And so to your point, the fact that Ryan can say there's 17 billion dollars allocated to something like ports, but it's unclear to him who's an expert in the space where that money goes and how it's spent gives us zero chance of figuring this out.
RY
Ryan Petersen
oppose ×2
▲ on
🏛️ Infrastructure trillions get captured by the contractors
E66 · 2022-02-05
▶ 39:57
There's $17 billion allocated to ports. I went and read it and I couldn't find any money that was going to be spent on building ports. It was like, study this. ... it's like things like, oh, each state must create our supply chain readiness report about it's like, what are you talking about? ... But like to then create studies and consultants, I don't know that any of it's going to hit the ground and shovel.
we don't need yesteryear's infrastructure. We don't need last century's infrastructure. New bridges and toll bridges or whatever nonsense is going to get inflated as a result of this recent infrastructure
the procurement process is the furthest thing from a free market where you essentially have these licensed people that are allowed to provide services. And so if you actually have the key critical input to making something possible, you have to get bundled in through contractors and subcontractors and general contractors who each take their five and 10 percent.
I think what's going to happen in the wake of this election is that this infrastructure bill is going to sail through. Because one of the crazier things that the progressives were doing was holding that bill hostage. ... Because a lot of those programs are going to be popular in a state like Virginia.
But the question of where those dollars actually go ultimately, if you kind of look at how government contract work is done, there will be a few people that own the majority of these contract service providers that will benefit heavily from this capital coming out of the government's coffers and will go into their bank accounts.
How much of it will go into like lining the pockets of shareholders and folks in very specific companies who just print an enormous amount of profit over the next few years? Probably another 150 or 200 billion.