APLD

Applied Digital Corporation

stock all instruments
-17.2
net board stance what this means
15.55
+9.7% · close 2026-11-06
-35% / -47% / -50%
1m / 3m / 12m
+4%
vs SPY since 2025-08-01
4%
of 52w range · -68.7% off high
—
hit rate as primary

Where All-In Alpha stands — 1 live idea

ideacallplayconvictioncontributesmoved yet?scored in
🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business POD DISAGREES ▼ SHORT adjacent ×0.5 34.3 -17.2 — 121d

Where the winds are blowing

NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES — rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. From the conviction ledger; an idea counts from birth until its window closes. Dots mark episodes where this ticker's ideas were actually mentioned; a dashed stretch is silence. Mentioned in the latest episode.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the talk lead the tape or follow it?

Who's pushing which way

each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × that idea's direction ON THIS TICKER × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down, unless this ticker is listed as the other side of it. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means

Gavin Baker
Gavin Baker 73% tech guest ×1.0
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E221
+3
pushes up
Sacks
Sacks 39% tech
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E293
+3
pushes up
Joe Lonsdale
Joe Lonsdale guest ×1.0
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E218
+2
pushes up
Jason
Jason 53% tech
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E293
+2
pushes up
BE
Ben Horowitz guest ×0.5
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E293
-1
pushes down
NI
Nikesh Arora guest ×0.5
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E294
-1
pushes down
Friedberg
Friedberg 55% tech
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E218
-2
pushes down
Chamath
Chamath 45% tech
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E296
-3
pushes down

What resolves next

scoring dates for the live ideas holding this ticker — each one turns into a scored result on that date, whether it flatters anyone or not

2027-03-08 121d ▼ 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business 34

The tape — what was actually said

every capture on any idea holding APLD, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode

Chamath Chamath support ×3 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E296 · 2026-11-07 ▶ 1:10:41
If anything, I think what's going to happen is, all the renter classes will get co-opted. For example, I don't know if you guys saw today, but Google just took over a Crusoe data center. They co-opted the renter. They're like, you're gone, we're going to take it over.
Chamath Chamath support ×1 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E295 · 2026-10-30 ▶ 46:41
If that's true, then Friedberg's chart is also true, which is that those rates cascade through the ecosystem. The neoclouds will have to pay more. All these other folks have to pay more. What that means is that you increase and you pull forward the risk of defaults, which we talked about last time.
NI Nikesh Arora support ×1 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E294 · 2026-10-23 ▶ 9:34
The challenge we have is, it's very hard to find a global, resilient, highly available, inference provider outside of the hyperscale community right now.
Sacks Sacks oppose ×3 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E293 · 2026-10-17 ▶ 40:25
So, in any event, payback period is really critical and as long as the payback periods are really short, I don't see how these companies can lose
Jason Jason oppose ×2 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E293 · 2026-10-17 ▶ 18:30
15% chance at the end of 27 next year, 23% at the end of 2028 seems a little far-fetched. Given the fact that they have a massive demand for their equipment, as Ben pointed out.
BE Ben Horowitz support ×1 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E293 · 2026-10-17 ▶ 14:35
It's why, by the way, we're not invested in any of these neoclouds either, for that reason, because that whole thing scares me, having been through it.
Chamath Chamath oppose ×1 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E289 · 2026-09-11 ▶ 1:07:43
You can work with folks like Amazon or Nebius or Fireworks.
Gavin Baker Gavin Baker oppose ×3 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E221 · 2025-03-29 ▶ 12:47
I think what may be underappreciated about CoreWeave is it's actually really hard to run these big training clusters. Everybody thinks it's easy, but to synchronize tens of thousands of GPUs where they're melting, or cables are being unplugged, and you lose a bunch of training data when it happens. I just think it may not be the commodity that everyone thinks it is, and it may turn out that it's much harder to do than people think.
Friedberg Friedberg support ×2 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E218 · 2025-03-08 ▶ 59:13
And so I worry a little bit about a business like this, where there's four or five companies that are each doing 80 billion dollars of CapEx this year to create infrastructure that effectively starts to replace what these guys are effectively offering out as a service. ... If I was to do diligence on this business, that's where I would spend a lot of my time is like, guys, what's the capacity going to be in a year or two? Sort of like when broadband hit the Internet, you didn't need speed doublers anymore.
Joe Lonsdale Joe Lonsdale oppose ×2 ▼ on 🤖 Neoclouds are a transitory GPU arbitrage, not a durable business E218 · 2025-03-08 ▶ 57:28
It's really interesting what they did is they locked down the full supply of tons of data centers, tons of the power they needed, tons of the chips. They're very, very thoughtful. I mean, they're effectively, they're traders and they're very economic. And I think they have a lot of the stuff well.