AMGN

Amgen Inc.

stock all instruments
+0.0
net board stance what this means
460.42
+0.0% · close 2026-11-06
+12% / +13% / +50%
1m / 3m / 12m
+41%
vs SPY since 2025-08-01
89%
of 52w range · -3.8% off high
—
hit rate as primary

Where All-In Alpha stands — 0 live ideas

No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.

Where the winds are blowing

NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES — rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. From the conviction ledger; an idea counts from birth until its window closes. Dots mark episodes where this ticker's ideas were actually mentioned; a dashed stretch is silence. Last mention E158 · silent for 137 episodes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the talk lead the tape or follow it?

Who's pushing which way

each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × that idea's direction ON THIS TICKER × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down, unless this ticker is listed as the other side of it. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means

Friedberg
Friedberg 43% equities
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E158
+2
pushes up
Jason
Jason 49% equities
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E158
-2
pushes down
Chamath
Chamath 42% equities
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E158
-3
pushes down
Sacks
Sacks 44% equities
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E158
-3
pushes down

Track record on AMGN

No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.

ideacallplayresultreturnvs SPYscored
📈 FTC merger-blocking chills early-stage biotech financing ▼ SHORT adjacent WRONG -6.8% -35.1 2024-05-19

The tape — what was actually said

every capture on any idea holding AMGN, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode

Friedberg Friedberg oppose ×2 ▼ on 📈 FTC merger-blocking chills early-stage biotech financing E158 · 2023-12-23 ▶ 42:58
I don't know if I'd take the antitrust regime as being the core driver of M&A not being on the table. ... The biggest driver of concern is just all the return on capital metrics that the big buyers are having to face. Return on invested capital is becoming more important than it's ever been
Sacks Sacks support ×3 ▼ on 📈 FTC merger-blocking chills early-stage biotech financing E158 · 2023-12-23 ▶ 40:29
the fact that regulators took 15 months to analyze the deal only to come to the conclusion that they basically weren't going to allow it, and then Adobe finally killed it, is going to have a chilling effect on M&A and Silicon Valley ... when you take half the potential exits off the table, you're absolutely making it tougher for VCs and founders to get a good return. It's that simple.
Jason Jason support ×2 ▼ on 📈 FTC merger-blocking chills early-stage biotech financing E158 · 2023-12-23 ▶ 39:29
One is if we put in more conservative, Republican, Libertarian, etc., less regulatory regime in Washington that could open up M&A as soon as 2025, perhaps.
Chamath Chamath support ×3 ▼ on 📈 FTC merger-blocking chills early-stage biotech financing E158 · 2023-12-23 ▶ 36:50
there is no viable M&A path for early stage venture capital businesses. So if you can't have a 20 billion dollar merger or a 40 billion dollar merger or a 15 or 20 billion dollar M&A with a high degree of confidence, then the path to liquidity through M&A is less than 20% of the outcomes
Sacks Sacks support ×2 ▼ on 📈 FTC merger-blocking chills early-stage biotech financing E137 · 2023-07-14 ▶ 40:27
There's so few ways to have a good exit in the tech industry that when you take away M&A, it puts a damper on all risk-taking and the deployment of risk capital into the ecosystem.
Sacks Sacks support ×2 ▼ on 📈 FTC merger-blocking chills early-stage biotech financing E129 · 2023-05-19 ▶ 59:31
Look, it is hard enough to make money as either a pharma investor or as a VC that there's only two good outcomes, right? There's IPOs, there's M&A, everything else basically goes, everything else is a zero, it goes bankrupt. So if you take M&A off the table, you really suppress the already challenged returns of venture capital.
Friedberg Friedberg oppose ×2 ▼ on 📈 FTC merger-blocking chills early-stage biotech financing E129 · 2023-05-19 ▶ 57:02
Yeah, but Chamath, we're just not seeing a lot of the younger stuff get blocked. I don't think we've seen any attempts at blocking speculative portfolio acquisitions or speculative company acquisitions.
Chamath Chamath support ×3 ▼ on 📈 FTC merger-blocking chills early-stage biotech financing E129 · 2023-05-19 ▶ 55:27
It is because the people that traffic in these stocks are the same ones that fund these early stage biotech companies. And I talked to a bunch of them, and they're like, if these guys block this kind of deal, we're going to get out of this game entirely. So just from the horse's mouth, what I'm telling you is you're going to see a pall come over the early stage venture financing landscape because a lot of these guys that are crossover investors, that own a lot of these public biotech stocks, that also fund the private stocks, will change their risk posture if they can't make money.