PGRE

PGRE

stock all instruments
⚠ No price data — delisted or never fetched, so any idea whose PRIMARY play is this ticker can never be scored (it closes unresolvable, earning nobody credit).
+0.0
net board stance what this means
—
hit rate as primary

Where All-In Alpha stands — 0 live ideas

No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.

Where the winds are blowing

NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES — rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. From the conviction ledger; an idea counts from birth until its window closes. Dots mark episodes where this ticker's ideas were actually mentioned; a dashed stretch is silence. Last mention E211 · silent for 84 episodes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the talk lead the tape or follow it?

Who's pushing which way

each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × that idea's direction ON THIS TICKER × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down, unless this ticker is listed as the other side of it. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means

Sacks
Sacks 44% equities
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E204
+2
pushes up
Friedberg
Friedberg 43% equities
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E204
+2
pushes up
Mark Pincus
Mark Pincus guest ×0.5
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E211
+2
pushes up
Chamath
Chamath 42% equities
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E211
-3
pushes down

Track record on PGRE

No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.

ideacallplayresultreturnvs SPYscored
📈 San Francisco's governance flip turns the city around ▲ LONG adjacent HALF +12.6% -3.0 2025-11-16

The tape — what was actually said

every capture on any idea holding PGRE, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode

Chamath Chamath oppose ×3 ▲ on 📈 San Francisco's governance flip turns the city around E211 · 2025-01-18 ▶ 57:26
I just think that the city is very poorly managed. And just the quality of many cities are poorly managed. And I think that there's a common through line in these poorly managed cities. All the things that you say, there's no will to do. There's no will to keep crime at bay. There's no will to make usable spaces for people. There's no will to invest in the arts. So what do you expect, right? There's more money collected by these cities, but there's just more total grift, corruption and waste.
Mark Pincus Mark Pincus support ×2 ▲ on 📈 San Francisco's governance flip turns the city around E211 · 2025-01-18 ▶ 53:11
I think it's great that Daniel Lurie is mayor of San Francisco, and he's putting smart people around him. And they're trying to rethink, first some attacking these core problems, but also how do we make San Francisco fun again? So I love things like congestion pricing. I think now is the time to try every new innovation that you ever thought of and see what sticks
Friedberg Friedberg support ×2 ▲ on 📈 San Francisco's governance flip turns the city around E204 · 2024-11-16 ▶ 57:37
And this budget needs to get put under control. San Francisco spends 1.5x per capita of what New York City spends. And that's something that Daniel and his team have said they're going to address sort of like their own doge. And there's a team going in there to address this. So I'm really bullish on what's going to happen with the city.
Sacks Sacks support ×2 ▲ on 📈 San Francisco's governance flip turns the city around E204 · 2024-11-16 ▶ 57:03
I'm bullish on the San Francisco turnaround because I think Daniel Lurie getting elected mayor was huge. And this doesn't get really as much attention, but it's very important.