OKLO

Oklo Inc.

stock all instruments
+0.0
net board stance what this means
43.8
+6.1% · close 2026-09-08
-10% / -22% / -38%
1m / 3m / 12m
+106%
vs SPY since 2024-10-18
5%
of 52w range · -74.8% off high
hit rate as primary

Where we stand — 0 live ideas

No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.

Where the winds are blowing

NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 47 EPISODES — rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the talk lead the tape or follow it?

Who's pushing which way

each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means

Jason
Jason w=1.00 energy
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E236
+2
pushes up
PH
Phil Deutch guest ×0.5
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E238
+2
pushes up
Chamath
Chamath w=0.55 energy
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E229
-2
pushes down
Friedberg
Friedberg w=0.78 energy
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E225
-2
pushes down
Sacks
Sacks w=0.94 energy
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E200
-3
pushes down

Track record on OKLO

No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.

ideacallplayverdictRαclosed
⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology ▼ SHORT adjacent MISS -143.0% -158.0 2025-10-18

The tape — what was actually said

every capture on any idea holding OKLO, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode

PH Phil Deutch oppose ×2 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E238 · 2025-08-09 ▶ 1:00:38
Yeah, so in the small modular reactor, Gen 4 stuff, we as well as others have investments there. A great company we like called X Energy.
Jason Jason oppose ×2 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E236 · 2025-07-19 ▶ 55:18
This is, I think, Gavin, one of the great upshots of the AI boom is that the AI companies, whether it's Meta or Google, they're so motivated that they'll actually go and upgrade the infrastructure. They'll invest in the, you know, small modular nuclear reactors that are coming.
Jason Jason oppose ×1 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E229 · 2025-05-24 ▶ 1:23:18
I saw yesterday the Tennessee Valley Authority filed the first ever application for a small modular reactor. Let's go. Hopefully, it gets approved very quickly.
Chamath Chamath support ×2 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E229 · 2025-05-24 ▶ 1:29:30
So then it's like, okay, what can I do? Nuclear? I can't, because that'll take till 2035
Chamath Chamath support ×2 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E225 · 2025-04-26 ▶ 1:23:03
This was an area that China chose, and now, you know, the US finds itself years behind on a technology that we invented, right? So this was research that happened at Oak Ridge National Lab.
Friedberg Friedberg support ×2 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E225 · 2025-04-26 ▶ 1:25:36
So the regulatory constraints need to be addressed first and foremost. That's, in my opinion, the number one mission critical strategic comparative for the United States right now.
Chamath Chamath support ×2 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E218 · 2025-03-08 ▶ 28:07
OK, if you ordered one today, the fastest that you can get it turned on is 2030 The fastest that you can get nuclear turned on is 2035 So we don't have the ability to generate incremental electricity very quickly, but for renewables.
Chamath Chamath support ×2 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E212 · 2025-01-25 ▶ 1:34:58
Yeah, the downside is the amount of time it takes to adequately build these things properly. The thing that China has had is, it's as Thomas' chart shows, is decades of practice in building things safely and quickly. We can build things, but we haven't had the practice to build them either safely or quickly because we haven't built any.
Friedberg Friedberg oppose ×3 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E212 · 2025-01-25 ▶ 1:30:42
we have new Gen 4 technologies that are meltdown proof, that have a totally different architecture where there isn't a setup, where you have runaway heat and ultimately a collapse of the reactor and a release of radioactive material, which is what happened at Chernobyl. These new systems, which we highlighted on the show a couple of months ago, like the Pebble Bed Reactor that's been in production making electricity in China, are incredible new technology architectures and they're here and they're running.
Jason Jason oppose ×2 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E200 · 2024-10-18 ▶ 53:39
I mean, I think there's plenty of land outside of the triangle here in Texas, where there is no density and you could put one and I'd have no problem with there being one 100 miles, 200 miles.
Friedberg Friedberg oppose ×3 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E200 · 2024-10-18 ▶ 48:57
that it might be the fastest path to solving this energy gap problem is SMRs
Chamath Chamath support ×3 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E200 · 2024-10-18 ▶ 1:02:27
SMRs don't work yet. We have theoretical ways in which we can profile and model that they work, but we don't have a functional one that people can look at and inspect.
Sacks Sacks support ×3 ▼ on ⚡ US SMR buildout stalls on NIMBY and unproven technology E200 · 2024-10-18 ▶ 51:47
I don't think anyone wants a nuclear power plant in their backyard. It's really simple. I mean, no matter what the benefits are for AI or for America's global competitiveness, I just don't think your typical community wants a nuclear power plant in their backyard. And I don't think it matters that much if it's a small modular one either.