+0.0
net board stance
what this means
292.74
+4.4% · close 2026-09-08
+8% / +1% / +141%
1m / 3m / 12m
+267%
vs SPY since 2025-03-29
67%
of 52w range · -22.2% off high
—
hit rate as primary
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 58 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on VRT
No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Nvidia's receivables build is the Blackwell transition, not vendor financing | ▲ LONG | adjacent | HIT | +54.6% | +40.0 | 2026-03-29 |
| ⚡ The US power bottleneck is turbines, transmission and storage, not generation | ▲ LONG | adjacent | HIT | +110.5% | +89.2 | 2026-07-04 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding VRT, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
PH
Phil Deutch
support ×2
▲ on
⚡ The US power bottleneck is turbines, transmission and storage, not generation
E238 · 2025-08-09
▶ 23:09
Anthropic just released a paper this month saying, we want 50 gigawatts of power for the AI in America and over the next three years. That's about as much power as was added all this year.
The problem is that if we put it in order right now, we can't get Nat gas turbine viable and turned on until 2030 It's not a technology issue, it's purely a supply chain issue. So I think what our energy policy needs to make sure we contemplate is that many of the things that we are debating are no longer issues of production, but they're issues of supply, transmission and distribution.
The other part of what I would say is the first part of what you're saying is very similar to what Intel did to scale their chip dominance in the 80s and 90s with this Intel Insight program. They didn't really need to do it probably in hindsight, but it helped them support an ecosystem and it helped diversify their buyer base so that fewer people had power over them.
If that trend continues past the July quarter, then I would say, hey, that's reason for concern, but this is a very understandable time for that to happen, from my perspective.