+27.5
net board stance
what this means
1012.71
+1.5% · close 2026-11-06
-2% / -2% /
1m / 3m / 12m
+2%
vs SPY since 2026-09-04
46%
of 52w range · -8.8% off high
—
hit rate as primary
Where All-In Alpha stands — 2 live ideas
| idea | call | play | conviction | contributes | moved yet? | scored in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏛️ US data-center freeze pushes the next AI buildout offshore; the US becomes a net token importer | ▲ LONG | adjacent ×0.5 | 55.0 | +27.5 | — | 731d |
| 🏛️ The anti-data-center backlash peaks and reverses post-midterms POD DISAGREES | ▲ LONG | adjacent ×0.5 | 0.0 | +0.0 | NOT MOVED YET | 301d |
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 9 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. From the
conviction ledger; an idea counts from birth until its window closes. Dots mark episodes
where this ticker's ideas were actually mentioned; a dashed stretch is silence.
Mentioned in the latest episode.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × that idea's direction ON THIS TICKER × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down, unless this ticker is listed as the other side of it. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
What resolves next
scoring dates for the live ideas holding this ticker — each one turns into a scored result on that date, whether it flatters anyone or not
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding EQIX, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
J Cal, you're right that if the US doesn't build the data centers, they'll get built in other countries and we'll be paying to import the tokens.
My base case is that the projects that are fully permitted will get done in 2027, but I don't think there's going to be major new projects in this new regime for a long time for the simple reason that there's no political incentive for anyone to grant a new permit or a new project.
So offshore data centers will be the trend of the next two years. That's what you're going to see and desktop usage of local models. I'll just make that prediction here.
But I think what the incoming governors are going to say is, these things are off the table, and instead we want to have directly measurable economic impacts before we even entertain this. I think what it means is we're going to see a slowdown.
I think the data centers end up being treated like utilities in the future. And I do think that the government are going to try and move down this path.
And then number two is, I think a economic slowdown benefits the Democrats going into the 28 election cycle. And so whatever they can do to kind of like influence power permitting and data centers, because as we talked about earlier, that's the lever bet.
The governments aren't going to want to let that happen. So they're going to try and stop the data centers
But I tend to think that Chamath is right, that Democrats want to do anything they can to sabotage the Trump economy.
That's the data center hoax. So we have a series of, I call them rotating hoaxes, where every six months there's a new one to try and convince us to sabotage the thing that's going to solve so many of our problems, especially the ones around affordability.
That's why I think the data center thing and why I disagree with Friedberg. I understand where he's coming from because this is why the data center will get so much scrutiny, but I also think the opposite will happen, which is more the Sacks idea of the free market.
And if we continue with this anti-data center crusade, we're going to be at a severe disadvantage. We already know that the precursor for data centers is power generation, and China's doubling their grid every decade, and we've been flat for about 25 years.
Good luck blocking a data center if we need it. That would be like blocking tanks being built during World War II, right?
The majority of Americans, so our data centers poll at negative 80, and people believe very deeply that we're going to die.
there's going to be a cascading set of decisions and reactions, and people will anchor into points of view on this topic and related topics around AI, which will look incredibly, incredibly dumb in six to nine months and a year from now ... That's my prediction.
There are great deals for local communities to be had ... We've seen that in Loudoun County, Virginia, the average taxpayers' property taxes went down by $6,000 because they're getting all this data center revenue.
I think you politically have to be. It's like polling at negative 80 And it's bipartisan.
I'm of the belief they're going to switch their position back to being pro data centers because they just are following the wave here