+0.0
net board stance
what this means
84.07
-0.6% · close 2026-09-08
-1% / +1% / +7%
1m / 3m / 12m
-32%
vs SPY since 2024-08-16
67%
of 52w range · -5.4% off high
—
hit rate as primary
Where we stand — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 47 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. Replayed from
score_events; an idea counts from birth until its window closes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × the idea's direction × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on XLP
No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | verdict | R | α | closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏛️ Harris's federal food price-gouging ban is a discredited price control | ▼ SHORT | adjacent | MISS | -33.7% | -51.2 | 2025-08-16 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding XLP, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
The idea of price controls is widely discredited across the political spectrum. I mean, I think virtually all economists agree on this.
If you cap what a company can charge, because what they'll do is they'll just stop producing. They'll manage to the margin that they'll just stop.
So arguably, I would say that trying to step in and cap prices will reduce competition and as a result, will reduce investment in improving productivity.