+0.0
net board stance
what this means
105.41
-0.7% · close 2026-11-06
+13% / +0% / +32%
1m / 3m / 12m
+5%
vs SPY since 2025-08-01
85%
of 52w range · -3.9% off high
0/1
hit rate as primary · vs SPY -16
Where All-In Alpha stands — 0 live ideas
No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.
Where the winds are blowing
NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES —
rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. From the
conviction ledger; an idea counts from birth until its window closes. Dots mark episodes
where this ticker's ideas were actually mentioned; a dashed stretch is silence.
Last mention E201 · silent for 94 episodes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the
talk lead the tape or follow it?
Who's pushing which way
each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × that idea's direction ON THIS TICKER × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down, unless this ticker is listed as the other side of it. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means
Track record on SBUX
As a PRIMARY play the besties are 0 hit / 0 partial / 1 miss over 1 closed window — credit 0.0, average vs SPY -15.5. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.
| idea | call | play | result | return | vs SPY | scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 📈 Starbucks is a sugar company - GLP-1s and sugar awareness are the real problem | ▼ SHORT | primary | WRONG | +2.0% | -15.5 | 2025-08-16 |
The tape — what was actually said
every capture on any idea holding SBUX, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode
maybe the sugary drinks maybe will fall out of fashion
if you start to graph the adoption of GLP-1s pervasively in America to the drop in same store sales
Starbucks has expanded their menu, as Chamath has pointed out, to becoming a seller of sugar
My question is just more, what does a company that's selling a product that people are learning is worse and worse for them? What do they do? They have to embrace a different alternative, but I think it can be very hard because it may be so disruptive to the core product that they sell.
So, the real issue is that more consumers, as they question the repercussions of consuming a lot of sugar, what will they do? As more consumers get on GLP-1s, what will they do?