RACE

Ferrari N.V.

stock all instruments
-3.9
net board stance what this means
416.13
-1.5% · close 2026-11-06
+8% / +1% / +4%
1m / 3m / 12m
+16%
vs SPY since 2026-03-27
84%
of 52w range · -4.7% off high
—
hit rate as primary

Where All-In Alpha stands — 1 live idea

ideacallplayconvictioncontributesmoved yet?scored in
📈 Brands go to zero — pricing power erodes POD DISAGREES ▼ SHORT adjacent ×0.5 7.9 -3.9 — 140d

Where the winds are blowing

NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 31 EPISODES — rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. From the conviction ledger; an idea counts from birth until its window closes. Dots mark episodes where this ticker's ideas were actually mentioned; a dashed stretch is silence. Last mention E289 · silent for 7 episodes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the talk lead the tape or follow it?

Who's pushing which way

each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × that idea's direction ON THIS TICKER × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down, unless this ticker is listed as the other side of it. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means

Chamath
Chamath 42% equities
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E289
+2
pushes up
Sacks
Sacks 44% equities
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E289
+2
pushes up
Friedberg
Friedberg 43% equities
1 idea (1 live) · last heard E289
-2
pushes down

What resolves next

scoring dates for the live ideas holding this ticker — each one turns into a scored result on that date, whether it flatters anyone or not

2027-03-27 140d ▼ 📈 Brands go to zero — pricing power erodes 8

The tape — what was actually said

every capture on any idea holding RACE, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode

Sacks Sacks oppose ×2 ▼ on 📈 Brands go to zero — pricing power erodes E289 · 2026-09-11 ▶ 1:29:30
I mean, their job was marketing, right? And they're actually like marketing images that are so contrary to what the brand was about.
Friedberg Friedberg support ×2 ▼ on 📈 Brands go to zero — pricing power erodes E289 · 2026-09-11 ▶ 1:28:19
I think that's the opposite of what Nike's focused on, because they shifted from product to narrative, and it was all about what's the narrative that we think the audience wants to hear.
Chamath Chamath oppose ×2 ▼ on 📈 Brands go to zero — pricing power erodes E289 · 2026-09-11 ▶ 1:23:59
You're not going to buy the clothes of a brand that you don't aspire to be like by wearing those clothes or wearing those shoes.
Chamath Chamath support ×2 ▼ on 📈 Brands go to zero — pricing power erodes E266 · 2026-03-27 ▶ 38:21
If I had to bet, I'm going to bet that brands go to zero. ... people want that abundance more than they want an affiliation to a brand. ... what this shows is an erosion of pricing power. All of these things are being eroded away.