IGF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

etf all instruments
+0.0
net board stance what this means
65.12
-0.6% · close 2026-11-06
+5% / -1% / +10%
1m / 3m / 12m
-6%
vs SPY since 2025-08-01
64%
of 52w range · -4.8% off high
—
hit rate as primary

Where All-In Alpha stands — 0 live ideas

No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.

Where the winds are blowing

NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES — rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. From the conviction ledger; an idea counts from birth until its window closes. Dots mark episodes where this ticker's ideas were actually mentioned; a dashed stretch is silence. Last mention E113 · silent for 175 episodes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the talk lead the tape or follow it?

Who's pushing which way

each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × that idea's direction ON THIS TICKER × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down, unless this ticker is listed as the other side of it. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means

Chamath
Chamath 51% politics-market
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E113
+2
pushes up
Friedberg
Friedberg 42% politics-market
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E113
+2
pushes up

Track record on IGF

No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.

ideacallplayresultreturnvs SPYscored
🏛️ Ukraine reconstruction is the next contractor and infra-fund windfall ▲ LONG adjacent HALF +15.5% -6.5 2024-01-27

The tape — what was actually said

every capture on any idea holding IGF, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode

Friedberg Friedberg support ×2 ▲ on 🏛️ Ukraine reconstruction is the next contractor and infra-fund windfall E113 · 2023-01-27 ▶ 1:15:40
Those are called infrastructure funds. And those infrastructure funds raise hundreds of billions of dollars to make investments, to build new infrastructure in markets that need it and that are willing to pay for it. And it will likely end up being kind of long-term debt assumed by that region to pay to do this work, and the beneficiaries will be the investors and owners of those infrastructure funds.
Chamath Chamath support ×2 ▲ on 🏛️ Ukraine reconstruction is the next contractor and infra-fund windfall E113 · 2023-01-27 ▶ 1:15:24
Well, yeah, where Larry Fink was like, hey, they're going to need three quarters of a trillion dollars of reconstruction support. We saw that play out in Iraq as well, where at first it was the war machine, and then it was the reconstruction machine, and together it was trillions and trillions of dollars.