CRL

Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

stock all instruments
+0.0
net board stance what this means
337.52
+7.8% · close 2026-11-06
+12% / +26% / +98%
1m / 3m / 12m
+82%
vs SPY since 2025-08-01
83%
of 52w range · -10.3% off high
—
hit rate as primary

Where All-In Alpha stands — 0 live ideas

No active idea holds this ticker. Anything below is history.

Where the winds are blowing

NET BOARD STANCE, LAST 60 EPISODES — rising = the besties are building this position, falling = abandoning it. From the conviction ledger; an idea counts from birth until its window closes. Dots mark episodes where this ticker's ideas were actually mentioned; a dashed stretch is silence. Last mention E224 · silent for 71 episodes.
PRICE VS SPY OVER THE SAME WINDOW, % — did the talk lead the tape or follow it?

Who's pushing which way

each voice's net push ON THIS TICKER — their most recent stance per idea × that idea's direction ON THIS TICKER × strength, so supporting a bearish idea pushes down, unless this ticker is listed as the other side of it. Not conviction (that lives on the idea); this is direction of travel per person. what w= means

Sacks
Sacks 48% politics-market
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E224
-1
pushes down
Friedberg
Friedberg 42% politics-market
1 idea (0 live) · last heard E224
-2
pushes down

Track record on CRL

No closed window has used this ticker as its primary play, so there is no scored record here yet. Adjacent plays are listed but never scored.

ideacallplayresultreturnvs SPYscored
🏛️ Federal research funding retreats from universities ▼ SHORT adjacent WRONG -25.3% -65.1 2026-04-19

The tape — what was actually said

every capture on any idea holding CRL, newest first · quotes verbatim, timestamps deep-link into the episode

Friedberg Friedberg support ×2 ▼ on 🏛️ Federal research funding retreats from universities E224 · 2025-04-19 ▶ 48:38
So the question today that's being asked is, should we be doing fundamental scientific research at universities given that over time the administrative overhead has grown and they're basically creating administrative workloads and employing people without necessarily having a market incentive?
Sacks Sacks support ×1 ▼ on 🏛️ Federal research funding retreats from universities E224 · 2025-04-19 ▶ 40:14
No one is saying that they have to get rid of DEI. They just have to give up their federal funding the way that Bob Jones University did.